I think you're asking me so I'm going to reply if I'm wrong. I apologize and I'm also gonna apologize ahead of time. Because I don't type well so I use a voice. So if there's any miss spellings, I apologize, why should anybody wake up? That's a hard question. And it's not for me to answer for everybody, cause everybody's different. This world is filled with different people that are meant for different things and their purpose, maybe some of them aren't meant to wake up. I don't know. I don't have the answers. I don't pretend to have the answers. All I know is what I feel inside me and me. It says, hell no, it says you protect the innocent. You do what's right, you could do? What's moral? Maybe maybe you don't always do what's moral. Not we are in this, not when we're in this situation. Everybody's reality is different, you know, two people see it the same. I say fight. I say this is our country, this is what we bust, our a** for and I'll be d***** if I'm gonna let anybody try to take it away from me, but that's how I was raised.
Do you think that you would be happier if you weren't awake? Would you rather unknow what you know?
Don't worry about the spelling; I also leave typos around even in articles (esp. in the first 24 hours).
Obviously, you haven't been reading me for long (which is fine, because I can't expect anyone to read my 1,200 articles). I have always advocated that being aware enables the person to prepare, which is more than most of those who are still asleep can have...
I live with someone who doesn't want to prepare. Who wants to live in La La Land which makes me feel like a sitting duck? It's difficult it's really difficult
YES. The various representations of "Lucifer" and "satanism" have been making me wonder which representation is "real" and which is a put-on, etc.
You said: "Satanist symbols in public spaces and matching ceremonies at the Olympics without the Vatican protesting confirm the alleged presence of Satanism. The Church of Satan has been a registered “church” since 1966. The human mind can indeed be perverted enough to follow Evil for some kickbacks, but why is it that the symbolism is repulsive instead of attractively proselytizing? Obviously, the romanticized version of Satanism represents a fake clan2, collecting only morons and generating fear."
I've been reading lots of philosophy and have been turning questions back and forth in my mind, and I am stuck with this line of thinking:
Why are there apparently wise and thoughtful men and women promoting the gnostic concept (found in dozens and dozens of indie and major feature films) of "Lucifer" as a good guy who really cares about us and is there to save us from the bad god (whom they call "the Demiurge") and then you have all the repulsive representations of Lucifer/Satan in the half-time shows, and in music videos, and music awards programs, and on and on, which would scare people away?
I ask, "What the hell is going on?"
(Pun at first unintended, then, seeing that it was good, intended.)
Why are some elites offering images of Lucifer being good, while others are making a big show about Lucifer being evil? Who is really on whose side, and whom is each side trying to lure or repel?
Are the alternately gross, comic, vulgar, and evil representations of "Lucifer/Satan" the equivalent of philosophical "false-flags" designed to throw people off discovering that Lucifer was never what he was portrayed (by the church, for example) to be?
In other words, is the figure of Lucifer -- whether real or metaphorical -- actually the *good guy* who has been and continues to be blackwashed from Day One in order to hide from Man Man's only ally on Earth against an arrogant, abusive, and insecure Demiurge (Yahweh)?
Or has Yahweh always been the good guy -- as advertised everywhere but in the Old Testament -- and Lucifer always the bad guy for real real?
Why are people in control presenting two opposing views of Lucifer?
"My favorite red herrings are “the 300” and “The Black Nobility,” as they tend to work best as simple solutions for simple minds who prefer cognitive security over searching for the complexity of facts: The Tiny Realm of Feeling Secure."
Oh boy here comes that crazy British Fran lass in the grade school lunch room to fling shit...
Great article Ray. The masses wake up in the morning, log on to their Confusion Generators and turn on their Propaganda Viewers so they can be told who or what to hate today. There’s something for everyone!
You mentioned the Georgia Guidestones being destroyed. When doing ritual magik, often times you burn the sigil at the end & blow it into the wind to bring completion.
There were many signs & symbols thru-out the Kirk event. This is how they speak to one another. WHY they are being so blatant, I do not know.
I'm considering it an IQ test for the overall population. I'm sure they are tallying on social media, the percentage of folks that see thru their propaganda. Rank & File style.
Gematria is the use of numbers giving a value to each letter. Thru numerology, they speak to one another using the media as it's medium.
It's no different than the Mason's using "G" 33 or 47 along with a square & compass. It's a message sent where our faulty language can be misconstrued. Think Their, They're & Witch Which or our, hour. Language is the deception. Signs & symbols rule our whiled. Edit: I meant whirled ... Wild whirled?
ANOTHER CONJECTURED REASON FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES:
[There's no way for me to verify or contradict this story myself. I'm just pointing out the claim for anyone interested.]
STAR SCOPE! It has been claimed online that the Georgia Guidestone monument had a long, cylindrical bore running through it -- maybe an inch in diameter -- which aimed at Polaris, the pole star, the north star. You as the visitor could look into one end of this granite scope at any time of night and you'd always see that star sitting inside the scope. (Same thing that one of the Egyptian pyramids had.)
THE PROBLEM WAS SUPPOSEDLY THIS: After some 30 or 40 years since the establishment of the monument, the pole star -- due to the accumulations of the wobble of the Earth -- should have moved enough out of its position to no longer be visible through that scope. And yet it remained centered there anyway, contradicting the claims of scientists that the Earth moves.
ONE POSSIBLE IMPLICATION OF THIS FACT WAS ... THE FLAT EARTH. (In which theory there is no terrestrial movement that would or could cause the stars to change positions over decades.)
HENCE, THE DESTRUCTION OF THE MONUMENT.
Here's an article on the purported movement of the pole star over years:
And then there's the obvious because these guys are so stupid when we beat them at their own game, it's gonna be that much more sweet. ;)
Why should anyone wake up?
That is the question:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/why-should-anyone-wake-up
The black nobility
Why should anyone "wake up"?
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/why-should-anyone-wake-up
No kidding:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-open-message-deception
or
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-is-the-resistance-and-whom-is
or
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-tiny-realm-of-feeling-secure
I think you're asking me so I'm going to reply if I'm wrong. I apologize and I'm also gonna apologize ahead of time. Because I don't type well so I use a voice. So if there's any miss spellings, I apologize, why should anybody wake up? That's a hard question. And it's not for me to answer for everybody, cause everybody's different. This world is filled with different people that are meant for different things and their purpose, maybe some of them aren't meant to wake up. I don't know. I don't have the answers. I don't pretend to have the answers. All I know is what I feel inside me and me. It says, hell no, it says you protect the innocent. You do what's right, you could do? What's moral? Maybe maybe you don't always do what's moral. Not we are in this, not when we're in this situation. Everybody's reality is different, you know, two people see it the same. I say fight. I say this is our country, this is what we bust, our a** for and I'll be d***** if I'm gonna let anybody try to take it away from me, but that's how I was raised.
Do you think that you would be happier if you weren't awake? Would you rather unknow what you know?
Don't worry about the spelling; I also leave typos around even in articles (esp. in the first 24 hours).
Obviously, you haven't been reading me for long (which is fine, because I can't expect anyone to read my 1,200 articles). I have always advocated that being aware enables the person to prepare, which is more than most of those who are still asleep can have...
I live with someone who doesn't want to prepare. Who wants to live in La La Land which makes me feel like a sitting duck? It's difficult it's really difficult
Well, preparation is possible up to 25-30%; I usually say, I' won't know what will hit me. Still, I insist on staying human just a bit longer. :)
Sometimes the scenario also changes, so remaining flexible can also work. Moreover, the prison is still incomplete:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/holes-in-the-nwo-net
YES. The various representations of "Lucifer" and "satanism" have been making me wonder which representation is "real" and which is a put-on, etc.
You said: "Satanist symbols in public spaces and matching ceremonies at the Olympics without the Vatican protesting confirm the alleged presence of Satanism. The Church of Satan has been a registered “church” since 1966. The human mind can indeed be perverted enough to follow Evil for some kickbacks, but why is it that the symbolism is repulsive instead of attractively proselytizing? Obviously, the romanticized version of Satanism represents a fake clan2, collecting only morons and generating fear."
I've been reading lots of philosophy and have been turning questions back and forth in my mind, and I am stuck with this line of thinking:
Why are there apparently wise and thoughtful men and women promoting the gnostic concept (found in dozens and dozens of indie and major feature films) of "Lucifer" as a good guy who really cares about us and is there to save us from the bad god (whom they call "the Demiurge") and then you have all the repulsive representations of Lucifer/Satan in the half-time shows, and in music videos, and music awards programs, and on and on, which would scare people away?
I ask, "What the hell is going on?"
(Pun at first unintended, then, seeing that it was good, intended.)
Why are some elites offering images of Lucifer being good, while others are making a big show about Lucifer being evil? Who is really on whose side, and whom is each side trying to lure or repel?
Are the alternately gross, comic, vulgar, and evil representations of "Lucifer/Satan" the equivalent of philosophical "false-flags" designed to throw people off discovering that Lucifer was never what he was portrayed (by the church, for example) to be?
In other words, is the figure of Lucifer -- whether real or metaphorical -- actually the *good guy* who has been and continues to be blackwashed from Day One in order to hide from Man Man's only ally on Earth against an arrogant, abusive, and insecure Demiurge (Yahweh)?
Or has Yahweh always been the good guy -- as advertised everywhere but in the Old Testament -- and Lucifer always the bad guy for real real?
Why are people in control presenting two opposing views of Lucifer?
I'm confused and would like to figure this out.
Always Excellent Ray! Have a great week ahead 🥰
I don't know how much The Spooks meet in churches or synagogues or mosques or alumni dinners, but for sure they meet in The Scientology clubhouse.
Oh, well. That's just another outlet. :)
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freemasonry-strongly-resembles-scientology
"My favorite red herrings are “the 300” and “The Black Nobility,” as they tend to work best as simple solutions for simple minds who prefer cognitive security over searching for the complexity of facts: The Tiny Realm of Feeling Secure."
Oh boy here comes that crazy British Fran lass in the grade school lunch room to fling shit...
...and you mean to say... exactly what? :)
Just a character on here that pushes the "black nobility" stuff..
You are most welcome to your opinion! :)
Great article Ray. The masses wake up in the morning, log on to their Confusion Generators and turn on their Propaganda Viewers so they can be told who or what to hate today. There’s something for everyone!
The doggies need their chew toys...
You mentioned the Georgia Guidestones being destroyed. When doing ritual magik, often times you burn the sigil at the end & blow it into the wind to bring completion.
There were many signs & symbols thru-out the Kirk event. This is how they speak to one another. WHY they are being so blatant, I do not know.
I'm considering it an IQ test for the overall population. I'm sure they are tallying on social media, the percentage of folks that see thru their propaganda. Rank & File style.
Gematria is the use of numbers giving a value to each letter. Thru numerology, they speak to one another using the media as it's medium.
It's no different than the Mason's using "G" 33 or 47 along with a square & compass. It's a message sent where our faulty language can be misconstrued. Think Their, They're & Witch Which or our, hour. Language is the deception. Signs & symbols rule our whiled. Edit: I meant whirled ... Wild whirled?
ANOTHER CONJECTURED REASON FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES:
[There's no way for me to verify or contradict this story myself. I'm just pointing out the claim for anyone interested.]
STAR SCOPE! It has been claimed online that the Georgia Guidestone monument had a long, cylindrical bore running through it -- maybe an inch in diameter -- which aimed at Polaris, the pole star, the north star. You as the visitor could look into one end of this granite scope at any time of night and you'd always see that star sitting inside the scope. (Same thing that one of the Egyptian pyramids had.)
THE PROBLEM WAS SUPPOSEDLY THIS: After some 30 or 40 years since the establishment of the monument, the pole star -- due to the accumulations of the wobble of the Earth -- should have moved enough out of its position to no longer be visible through that scope. And yet it remained centered there anyway, contradicting the claims of scientists that the Earth moves.
ONE POSSIBLE IMPLICATION OF THIS FACT WAS ... THE FLAT EARTH. (In which theory there is no terrestrial movement that would or could cause the stars to change positions over decades.)
HENCE, THE DESTRUCTION OF THE MONUMENT.
Here's an article on the purported movement of the pole star over years:
https://medium.com/the-continuum-zeroing-in-blog/does-our-pole-star-change-from-time-to-time-245581d493fa
[Again, I have no way to verify or contradict this claim. I'm merely presenting the claim that I heard for anyone interested.]
That's super interesting! Thanx for sharing!
Very welcome! I hope it's true.