There will always be sensational reports to occupy minds eager to consume them.
Added on October 3, 2025:
As much as I didn’t want to influence anyone with my experience, I must share it. Even when I cannot see anything immediately important, I tend to peruse intelligent and inspiring sources, which slows down the brain damage everyone, including me, has been suffering from in the age of microwaving the human mind:
No news is not always good news. It’s an alternative to exhausting the audience with useless details or idiotic information. Is it time to take a rest?
You also must have noticed that apart from repetitive details about Kirk, the Tylenol red herring, the convid injections (that either caused irreversible harm, or are simply moot) and the Digital ID, hardly anything else is surfacing these days.
As you know, I don’t write about topics that others address better than I can, and usually publish things, when I have something unique to say.
Many readers seem to be taking a rest, but you are here, and your opinion might help others, including me.
PLEASE, DEVOTE THIS COMMENT SESSION TO DISCUSSING WHAT, HOW, AND WHY TO READ DURING THESE DAYS OF INFORMATION SHORTAGES AND ABOMINABLE FORMS OF DISINFORMATION.
My thinking is you're one of the best substacks on the internet because the focus is on thinking. Thinking about one's thinking. Meta-cognition. The topics you select are significantly important. Relevant and timely although to your credit sometimes prescient before they're time. I've read all the seminal papers, books, and delved deeply into futuristics and you demonstrate acuity and agility across subjects I've thoroughly researched. You welcome comments and respond to them. The validation of the faked death of Charlie Kirk is an example of how observant and deductive your thinking is....and right now I think he was killed after the faked death. I sometimes can't keep up with the post-mortem....have the many layers of the deception been revealed. Are we in the change of phase (e.g., like from solids to liquids to vapors in physics) from milquetoast to a more radical conservatism? Or should I be more substrate driven in my thinking and "get" that all labels that silo and compartmentalize make the event a mere distraction in the bigger scheme? Is the real issue always that mankind, those in power serve their dark elohim, those in power are mainly pawns on the board, and all killing, murder, stealing and destroying and ritual sacrifices are part of the war in the heavens?
You’re absolutely right, no news isn’t necessarily bad news. Sometimes it’s a sign that the noise machine is sputtering or that we’re simply saturated. I’ve always tried to write only when there’s something to add that isn’t already being screamed from every rooftop. That hasn’t changed.
What we’re seeing now, with the endless loops about Kirk, the Tylenol distraction, the convid injections, the Digital ID chatter, it feels like a holding pattern. Meanwhile, anything truly new or dangerous is either buried or drip-fed so slowly that it’s almost imperceptible. That’s why so many are stepping back.
This might actually be the right moment to recalibrate: to read long-form work, older investigative pieces, forgotten books, even primary sources rather than today’s churn. To study context instead of reacting to the outrage-of-the-hour. In short, to build mental muscle while the noise level is relatively low.
If others feel the same, I’d like this comment session to become a little workshop, not another complaint about the information drought, but a space where we share what’s still worth reading and why. If we can do that, then even this “quiet” period becomes a net gain for all. 🙂