The words "one atom thick" do not imply weakness. It just means it's a 2D structure vs. a 3D structure.
Also, while I understand the reluctance to use AI models such as ChatGPT, the only alternative I have is Google and Bing. The "alternative" search engines use their results, and in turn are paid by the parent companies. These results are particularly useless for health-related information since they only link to officially approved sources. Moreover, whereas the powers that be have had a lot of time to tinker with search engines results, we're still in the early phase (the "carrot" phase if you will) of AI. Still, I often try to use keywords from AI results to verify the information from other sources. AI is sometimes flat out mistaken, in which cases I find it to be very "apologetic" when I refute it.
What you wrote there doesn't change anything for me. I'll quote your words here:
"The Trump establishment is making progress in the centralization of power and towards AI control."
Is this supposed to mean I should be afraid to ask ChatGPT any questions, even in logged out mode?
"ChatGPTs are only terminals for global data collection..."
It's not going to learn much about me if I'm mainly asking questions.
"elaborate AI training..."
Perhaps you and I shouldn't even be blogging because surely it will crawl through Substack to read all our posts. Also, the idea that all AI training is bad is based on the assumption that the dark forces will prevail over the rest of us. So your message is, do not use AI even for good purposes because our side will inevitably lose anyway? We might as well just eat and drink then (1 Cor. 15:32).
"and constructing deepfakes, especially for the participants, who will not be missed later in long-distance relationships even after they die."
I'm not so paranoid that I'm worried about being killed and AI pretending to be me. Anyway, this would only mean that I shouldn't get so romantic or friendly with AI that I reveal personal secrets or mannerisms. No worries. I interact in a impersonal, professional manner. Also, again, I mostly just ask questions.
"for the AI tracking of every single living creature"
I only use AI occasionally at my house. I'm not off grid, so "they" already know where I live. I think getting rid of my cell phone would be the first thing to do if I seriously want to be less trackable.
"those using AI can be now clearly suspected of being collaborators with the enemy…"
Seriously? Anyone who falsely condemns nearly other human being as an enemy collaborator ends up with no friends, not by necessity but by their own ignorance.
Despite the fact that it sometimes misinforms me, much of the information that AI provides can't be found anywhere else. For example, it's gone through some websites that now no longer exist.
StartPage uses Google and Bing, but Brave mostly uses its own indexing so that one is a good choice. I'm often not happy with Brave's results, but I plan to use it more often myself in the future.
You are rephrasing what I am saying: I never condemned anyone; only said they are under suspicion, which they are.
If AI is your only source to "information you can't find anywhere else," how do you know it's factual?
You don't have to be paranoid to realize that all your public appearances, including e-mails and phone calls are recorded and can be used against you, while you can also be replaced by an AI-generated deepfake.
Do you know that questions also contain what you consider facts? "How many people have you killed?" for instance, implies that you have killed people. The same applies to negation.
Still, it's YOUR life; you do as you please.
I'd rather this exchange stuck to the topic (tricking immune responses).
??? I quoted your exact words: "clearly suspected of being collaborators with the enemy…" A person can't get much harsher than that. The first definition of condemn is "To express strong disapproval of: synonym: criticize." Misinformation comes from many sources, not just AI. If you turn people who are fighting against state power against one another through what you write for no valid reason, whose work are you doing, really?
Currently, AI readily puts out a lot of information that undermines the same authorities who ultimately want to use it against us. We can either choose to recognize this as an opportunity or ignore this opportunity at our own risk.
I don't see how anything I've written is off topic. The part you quoted from ChatGPT about aptamers is easily verifiable from other sources. I will continue to do what works best for me and my readers while, with God's help, applying discernment and wisdom in all things.
After reading an article on the history of how the term " immune system " came to be, I now just call it the living system. And then we have the elimination system. The life and death cycle...
Antibiotics basically clean up the gut flora (colloidal silver seems to do the same). Those with an appendix can recover faster, because the appendix acts as a backup reservoir for the gut flora.
Unfortunately, antibiotic use also seems to have long-term effects, and arthritis might be one of them... AB-resistant bacteria due to AB-use are "only" the icing on the cake...
The kinds of toxins, poisons, chemicals now being thrown at the human body is beyond comprehension and likely, beyond count. Trying to protect against or detox seems to be an exercise in frustration. Many (most?) detoxing agents are themselves toxic. What works against one toxin (or class of toxins) very well may not work against others. Combining detox agents may in itself cause a new set of illness (like taking too many Big Pharma drugs that cause side effects necessitating more drugs). Between poisons, radiations, etc. attempting to be "healthy" can be a time consuming, costly affair without guaranteed results.
As you are also saying, as it all looks like an AI-designed process, even the (toxic) countermeasures are most likely drive the victims to the same end:
I never used to be allergic to bug bites. But now I cannot use bug spray because of chemical allergies and when the bugs bite, I itch and swell up for several weeks. I use homeopathy to help but you have to wonder what they have done to the bugs. I know they release gmo mosquitoes in certain states but I do not live in one of those states. And yes I know they are probably doing it and not telling us just like the chemtrails they put in the sky by us day and night.
I spent one day in the mountains, at a friend cabin in Kamas, Utah, a beautiful location, next to a river. I am not sure if they were mosquitoes or some other type of bugs bites, but the itch and swelling was unbearable. I left the place after 24 hours and whatever I tried at home did not help. I tried Chinese balms what had a fast effect before, Aloe Vera, self made ointments with essential oils, nothing worked. In despair I took the spray with hydrogen peroxide and sprayed all over the bites. In two days the itch was gone and slowly the marks dried out. I never had such experience before and strangely, my husband did not get bitten at all.
Seems to me when one starts messing around with the natural order of things one is actually destroying what was created correctly in the first place.
Bye trying to correct the mistakes made by this “messing around” one is making it worse instead.
Add to all of this the poisons we are exposed to constantly is not helping.
Danger, Danger Will Robinson we are in big trouble.
At this point I think all we can do is do everything we can to look, listen and learn how to stay as healthy as we can to avoid as much danger as we possibly can.
I may be a bit off base on my take away, but one thing I am sure about is Ray is doing his best to try and help us all do just that.
The words "one atom thick" do not imply weakness. It just means it's a 2D structure vs. a 3D structure.
Also, while I understand the reluctance to use AI models such as ChatGPT, the only alternative I have is Google and Bing. The "alternative" search engines use their results, and in turn are paid by the parent companies. These results are particularly useless for health-related information since they only link to officially approved sources. Moreover, whereas the powers that be have had a lot of time to tinker with search engines results, we're still in the early phase (the "carrot" phase if you will) of AI. Still, I often try to use keywords from AI results to verify the information from other sources. AI is sometimes flat out mistaken, in which cases I find it to be very "apologetic" when I refute it.
Please read the part on GPT in my article:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/flying-under-the-radar
Personally, I prefer Startpage and Brave.
What you wrote there doesn't change anything for me. I'll quote your words here:
"The Trump establishment is making progress in the centralization of power and towards AI control."
Is this supposed to mean I should be afraid to ask ChatGPT any questions, even in logged out mode?
"ChatGPTs are only terminals for global data collection..."
It's not going to learn much about me if I'm mainly asking questions.
"elaborate AI training..."
Perhaps you and I shouldn't even be blogging because surely it will crawl through Substack to read all our posts. Also, the idea that all AI training is bad is based on the assumption that the dark forces will prevail over the rest of us. So your message is, do not use AI even for good purposes because our side will inevitably lose anyway? We might as well just eat and drink then (1 Cor. 15:32).
"and constructing deepfakes, especially for the participants, who will not be missed later in long-distance relationships even after they die."
I'm not so paranoid that I'm worried about being killed and AI pretending to be me. Anyway, this would only mean that I shouldn't get so romantic or friendly with AI that I reveal personal secrets or mannerisms. No worries. I interact in a impersonal, professional manner. Also, again, I mostly just ask questions.
"for the AI tracking of every single living creature"
I only use AI occasionally at my house. I'm not off grid, so "they" already know where I live. I think getting rid of my cell phone would be the first thing to do if I seriously want to be less trackable.
"those using AI can be now clearly suspected of being collaborators with the enemy…"
Seriously? Anyone who falsely condemns nearly other human being as an enemy collaborator ends up with no friends, not by necessity but by their own ignorance.
Despite the fact that it sometimes misinforms me, much of the information that AI provides can't be found anywhere else. For example, it's gone through some websites that now no longer exist.
StartPage uses Google and Bing, but Brave mostly uses its own indexing so that one is a good choice. I'm often not happy with Brave's results, but I plan to use it more often myself in the future.
You are rephrasing what I am saying: I never condemned anyone; only said they are under suspicion, which they are.
If AI is your only source to "information you can't find anywhere else," how do you know it's factual?
You don't have to be paranoid to realize that all your public appearances, including e-mails and phone calls are recorded and can be used against you, while you can also be replaced by an AI-generated deepfake.
Do you know that questions also contain what you consider facts? "How many people have you killed?" for instance, implies that you have killed people. The same applies to negation.
Still, it's YOUR life; you do as you please.
I'd rather this exchange stuck to the topic (tricking immune responses).
??? I quoted your exact words: "clearly suspected of being collaborators with the enemy…" A person can't get much harsher than that. The first definition of condemn is "To express strong disapproval of: synonym: criticize." Misinformation comes from many sources, not just AI. If you turn people who are fighting against state power against one another through what you write for no valid reason, whose work are you doing, really?
Currently, AI readily puts out a lot of information that undermines the same authorities who ultimately want to use it against us. We can either choose to recognize this as an opportunity or ignore this opportunity at our own risk.
I don't see how anything I've written is off topic. The part you quoted from ChatGPT about aptamers is easily verifiable from other sources. I will continue to do what works best for me and my readers while, with God's help, applying discernment and wisdom in all things.
Look, you said I was condemning. Sorry, I don't have time and energy for this.
Other than that, it's YOUR choice; I don't know how I have anything to do with it...
After reading an article on the history of how the term " immune system " came to be, I now just call it the living system. And then we have the elimination system. The life and death cycle...
That's an appealing way to put it; your description seems to be compatible with my assumption about health and illness; it's all about balance:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/my-balance-theory-of-health-and-illness
Heads up: Superbugs thrive as access to antibiotics fails in India
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ced262l83gjo
Antibiotics are overused by some and out of reach for others - fuelling resistance and leaving deadly gaps in care.
Antibiotics basically clean up the gut flora (colloidal silver seems to do the same). Those with an appendix can recover faster, because the appendix acts as a backup reservoir for the gut flora.
Unfortunately, antibiotic use also seems to have long-term effects, and arthritis might be one of them... AB-resistant bacteria due to AB-use are "only" the icing on the cake...
The kinds of toxins, poisons, chemicals now being thrown at the human body is beyond comprehension and likely, beyond count. Trying to protect against or detox seems to be an exercise in frustration. Many (most?) detoxing agents are themselves toxic. What works against one toxin (or class of toxins) very well may not work against others. Combining detox agents may in itself cause a new set of illness (like taking too many Big Pharma drugs that cause side effects necessitating more drugs). Between poisons, radiations, etc. attempting to be "healthy" can be a time consuming, costly affair without guaranteed results.
As you are also saying, as it all looks like an AI-designed process, even the (toxic) countermeasures are most likely drive the victims to the same end:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-do-the-fake-cures-accomplish
I couldn’t put a like or comment on your reply to my comment.
Hope this goes through.
Thanks for your reply and added links. I appreciate your willingness to share and help us all.
You and are are supposed to be engaged in a discussion; no courtesies are necessary.
I never used to be allergic to bug bites. But now I cannot use bug spray because of chemical allergies and when the bugs bite, I itch and swell up for several weeks. I use homeopathy to help but you have to wonder what they have done to the bugs. I know they release gmo mosquitoes in certain states but I do not live in one of those states. And yes I know they are probably doing it and not telling us just like the chemtrails they put in the sky by us day and night.
A good clay applied as a poultice is usually helpful. The best I've used is Magnetic Clay.
How about hydrogen peroxide?
I spent one day in the mountains, at a friend cabin in Kamas, Utah, a beautiful location, next to a river. I am not sure if they were mosquitoes or some other type of bugs bites, but the itch and swelling was unbearable. I left the place after 24 hours and whatever I tried at home did not help. I tried Chinese balms what had a fast effect before, Aloe Vera, self made ointments with essential oils, nothing worked. In despair I took the spray with hydrogen peroxide and sprayed all over the bites. In two days the itch was gone and slowly the marks dried out. I never had such experience before and strangely, my husband did not get bitten at all.
Haven't tried it but worth a try.
To make a long story short, the commoner is royally screwed. My next post will be on the potential remedies, no matter how deceptive they might be.
The mosquitoes have been around here, too for years:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/no-need-for-any-more-vaccinations
Anything that sucks out the poison might work. Carbon, unions, vinegar, or even baking soda in patches.
Allergies are invented illnesses for poisonings... Or worse, a conditional reflex by the body.
Seems to me when one starts messing around with the natural order of things one is actually destroying what was created correctly in the first place.
Bye trying to correct the mistakes made by this “messing around” one is making it worse instead.
Add to all of this the poisons we are exposed to constantly is not helping.
Danger, Danger Will Robinson we are in big trouble.
At this point I think all we can do is do everything we can to look, listen and learn how to stay as healthy as we can to avoid as much danger as we possibly can.
I may be a bit off base on my take away, but one thing I am sure about is Ray is doing his best to try and help us all do just that.
Stay as healthy as possible !!!
Just sums it up.
My next post will summarize the "remedies" again, because lots of readers have never read those out of my 1,100 articles.
Staying healthy, however, has been impossible in the last 60 or more years, due to all the chemicals used in food, chemtrails, and water.
Eating little might help:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/to-eat-or-not-to-eat
Nobody can escape from the radiation:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-you-want-to-know-your-radiation
People are willing to prostitute their own property for a little kickback:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-invasion-of-the-infernal-towers-13b
"Vaccines" have been moot for years:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/no-need-for-any-more-vaccinations
Ultimately, it doesn't matter:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-shortlist-of-whats-coming
" Eating little , might help."
Once I got a letter from a friend with two advices . " 1, Stop eating . Its a nasty habit . 2, If you live too long , change your name ."