Does Graphene Exist? How Does It Matter?

Do you mind?

Source

---

A challenge

Proton Magic published an article yesterday in which he issues a challenge for proving that graphene exists:

The True Nature of Graphene

Fair enough; the question deserves a day in court.

“Proof,” just like any type of “definition,” can be only system-specific. There is no such thing as “universal proof,” so in order to address the problem PM has posed, the “proof” must be assigned to a system. As the world in which things function is an open system, only an open system would suffice. Closed systems collapse, if their fundamental premise stops working, but such premises can change in open systems and the system can live happily ever after. No problem; as long as an open system performs a task by filling one or more functions, it remains useful, and nobody will doubt its fundamental premise(s). The only tiny problem with open systems is that the human mind can only build cognitive models for closed systems and it is an open system itself that is incapable of comprehending itself. So much for ANY “proof” that humans can successfully understand…

What about graphene?

In 2023, in popular terminology, the meaning of “graphene,” based on its popularized functions, has been mostly reserved to graphene oxide (GO) and graphene hydroxide (GH). Moreover, according to Noack¹, “covid” “vaccines” constitute mass murder, because the injections contain graphene oxide or graphene hydroxide, depending on the batch. Apart from being an authority in graphene and a private entrepreneur with his London-based company, where did he get the information from? What are GO and GH good for? The system in which their existence can be substantiated was established by the often-mandated “covid” injections.

The link to nanotech

Nanotechnology has been around for decades and, whatever it is, it has proven to work:

https://builtin.com/robotics/nanorobotics

Graphene hydroxide itself is supposed to have several applications:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589965119300042#sec4

So, how exactly can something to be proven to exists? A magician can show the audience that things disappear or things that have been considered nonexistent, exist. Quacks rely on the ever-increasing range of the placebo-effect and the power of individual commitment after heavily investing in something (in this case, expensive “medications”), and the illusion can perform therapeutic functions.

The existence of “viruses” doesn’t have to be proven, because tiny particles that virologists and other dumb people call “viruses,” do exist; the disagreement lies in their origin, their operation, and their function². As far as I can see, there is no such public disagreement regarding graphene oxide.

The depopulation agenda

The eugenicist movement started around the time Darwin published The Origin of Species about 164 years ago, followed shortly by Spencer’s idea of “the survival of the fittest” in 1864. Since that time, it gained many major proponents who wanted the human species to evolve without being held back by the progenies of “unfit.” That neatly tied in with Malthusianism from 1798 that warned about overpopulation and the necessity of population control. Influential eugenicists have produced spectacular results: two world wars, pesticides in everything, “vaccinations” with full indemnity for the manufacturers, central banks that are owned by globalist interests, fiat currencies, global control over the money flow by central banks, hijacked governments, healthcare, and court systems, full ownership and/or control of production and distribution, and several “minor” toxins in everyday life (e.g. fluoride , “forever” chemicals, contraceptive hormones, psychiatric “medicines,” and microplastics in drinking water and comestibles, food additives and preservatives, artificial sweeteners, and the list is endless. The latest brands of “vaccines,” excessive radiation poisoning by 5G towers, multi-level toxins and pathogens in chemtrails, and the conversion of the food supply have become faster and more efficient methods for depopulation, but I have also pointed out that good-old forms of poisoning alone could do the job:

Invisible pathogens or the refusal of “vaccination” can be blamed for future plandemics that will certainly enable a worldwide tyranny through “healthcare” and “carbon footprints,”³ with the success guaranteed by the imposition of the CBDC, which is in progress:

Common folks are embracing the idea of “resistance” that has accomplished exactly nothing, but it’s good enough for people to wait for a savior who will never come:

Here is a typical example of false hope raised regarding the introduction of the CBDC:

Global depopulation and population control

Any of the previously-mentioned methods would work for population reduction, and their combination ensures plausible deniability.

Large-scale clandestine experiments to control mood and behavior as well as successful mind control operations were unleashed in the 1960s and have recently culminated in psychotronic methods that can have unlimited uses that include setting people on each other:

So, does graphene exist or not? As far as the fast-approaching extinction-level-event is concerned, it doesn’t matter. The rate at which people are being eliminated has been accelerating, and mind control is undeniably present in public education, the globalist-controlled MSM, internet searches, HAARP, 5G, “smart” meters and devices, and instructions can be issued by using light, municipal water lines, and the electric grid.

1. The death of Dr. Andreas Noack: https://www.bitchute.com/video/WCfyNz0eK6zV/

His wife’s story: https://www.henrymakow.com/2021/11/dr-andreas-noack-murdered.html

2. https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-is-a-virus

3. https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-is-the-creditor-for-your-antisocial