How Can You Ascertain How Bad Synthetic Chemicals Are for You?
"Medications," supplements, household and cosmetic products, you name it...
The brochure is from South Africa, but MSDS is the same everywhere.
This time, I am pointing out that some things are commonly accepted as good or helpful, while they are toxic and harmful. Although I’ve mentioned it before, I am also showing a way that still seems to work to find out about toxicity.
MOST EVERYDAY TOXINS ARE IGNORED
My mother was a chemical engineer. She told me a story about two night janitors from work, who discussed their health and agreed that the both “had blood pressure.” One of them was not feeling well, and asked the other one for her medication. After taking it, she fell into a coma and passed away. The two, didn’t realize that blood pressure can be either too high or too low. The same sloppiness seems to preside in common narratives about stuff that is “good for you, because it helped me.”
***
In my articles, I have mentioned several times that the same chemical compound can be toxic or beneficial, depending on its crystal or molecular structure. Pharmaceuticals, on their best days, attempt to mimic nature, but they fail miserably most, if not all of the time.
What remains is synthetic chemicals being used everywhere, that is, lab-produced, which include “medications,” supplements, processed food1 (more or less, everything from the grocery store2 is processed by now), non-stick cookware, flame retardants, paints (including painted textiles), preservatives (not only food), microwaves and microwaved food, Wi-Fi, microplastics (inhaled even from rugs), household and cosmetic products, climate engineering3, and environmental toxins4 that cause various conditions for which the “medical” profession has devise cutesy names and calls them illnesses5. Organic forms of poisoning are also common, and nobody is talking about modified proteins that seem to account for many of the most common chronic conditions and might be the weakest link in the process that the globalists are using for depopulation and full control over people, because they can at least be identified:
What Do Peanut Allergy, Lyme, and Arthritis Have in Common?
Please, notice that much of the following piece is only offering a hypothetical approach to describing the essence of the process that is being employed these days in order to decimate and enslave everyone. You are most welcome to improve and/or alter the hypothesis, and I’m eager to learn more from you, too.
TOXIC PRODUCTS ARE OFTEN DECLARED TO SUPPORT HEALTH
I have always been cautious about assuming that anything made by Big Pharma is good for me, and supplements were no exception6. This time, I bumped into an article that substantiated that Vitamin D is actually rat poison:
The same author also suggests that Vitamin B12 is cyanide7:
The author requires paid subscription to comment, but there is not much to add to his texts; his argument sound wholesome to me to the extent that I feel motivated to popularize his method: Read the list of ingredients (but never assume it’s complete) and/or look up safety report on the ingredients and the product itself.
THE CASE OF SODIUM CITRATE
Let me employ agent131711’s method and conduct a bit of research on the toxicology of sodium citrate. I raised the question a few weeks ago, but haven’t followed up on my article: I repeatedly cautioned my readers about not trusting anything from chemical manufacturers before thoroughly researching it, because they can contain just about anything that is not listed among the ingredients, much in the way convid “vaccines” provided evidence to the mass poisoning method. It seems like a good idea to suspect all synthetic chemicals and their potential combinations seriously and to conduct their own unbiased research. Let me invite you to join the efforts after my first initiative:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/is-sodium-citrate-good-for-you
In the comment section after the article, I was called names, and the main promoter of sodium citrate8, instead of responding to my concerns, called me an agent and banned me from his comment sections. Nobody was willing or able to engage in a civilized discussion about the subject, and all I was offered was anecdotal evidence, in the tradition of the two night janitors in my mother’s lab.
I encountered the same mindless animosity after pointing out that the actual chemical contents in ivermectin may have changed after doctors were suddenly allowed to prescribe it:
Further Considerations about Ivermectin That You Won't Find Elsewhere
My original suspicion On May 7, 2023, I published an article to warn people that Ivermectin (from now: IVM) these days might be a Trojan Horse: https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/red-alert-about-ivermectin-a-trojan My suspicion was based on three elements:
What happens, if you take a closer look at what sodium citrate is, when you purchase it in a store?
Warning: While the following might sound too technical, perusing it can still show how complex the problem is.
THE VERSATILITY OF THE TERM
When trying to buy it, https://www.laballey.com/products/sodium-citrate-usp-grade?gad_source=5 lists the inorganic sodium salt as Sodium Citrate Dihydrate, with the following synonyms: Trisodium citrate dihydrate, Sodium citrate dihydrate, Sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate, Citric acid trisodium salt dihydrate, Sodium citrate hydrate.
In one of the largest chemical database at Fisher Scientific, at the product’s safety data sheet, https://www.fishersci.com/shop/products/sodium-citrate-dihydrate-granular-certified-fisher-chemical-6/S279500?searchHijack=true&searchTerm=sodium-citrate-dihydrate-granular-certified-fisher-chemical-6&searchType=Rapid&matchedCatNo=S279500, according to the latest Certificate of Analysis (https://assets.fishersci.com/TFS-Assets/certificate/bFJqTzNGaGhOQlFNZnljZ0JobUxvdz09/COA/COA_S279500_233532_1.pdf), the product is “Not for direct administration to humans or animals. It is the responsibility of the final formulator and end user to determine suitability based upon the intended use of the end product.”
In short, the manufacturer lays all responsibility on the end user.
The statement is all the more intriguing, because the product is nearly 100% pure; as it’s also inorganic, internet sellers’ statement on “Non-GMO” make literally no sense, but at least they don’t call it “organic.”
The name of the salt itself, however, can get even more confusing.
According to PubChem, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Sodium-Citrate#section=Synonyms, the following chemicals can be called sodium citrate:
anhydrous sodium citrate
Citra ph
Monosodium Citrate
sodium citrate
sodium citrate dihydrate
Sodium Citrate Monobasic
sodium citrate, anhydrous
trisodium citrate dihydrate
(Medical subject headings, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/2028073)
The “depositor-supplied synonyms” are
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, sodium salt (1:3)
2-Hydroxy-1,2,3-propanenetricarboxylic acid trisodium salt dihydrat
TOXICITY RECORDS ARE JUST AS COMPLEX
According to Fisher Scientific, the toxicity and use of Sodium Citrate varies by the type: Sodium citrate is an umbrella term, so there is no single conclusion one can draw about the use of the chemical in improving human health:
https://www.fishersci.com/us/en/catalog/search/sds?selectLang=EN&store=&msdsKeyword=sodium+citrate
The search for sodium citrate produces 87 chemicals and covers a wide range of applications. No, I am not going to go through all 87 of them, only show that judging their toxicity is not for lay people and, possibly, for no outsiders, either.
Considering their possible applications, some of them sound promising (but I noted that in my original article, too):
thermo-scientifictrade-remeltrade-sodium-citrate
R21262 can “Decontaminate clinical specimens prior to inoculation of media for isolating Mycobacterium spp. and fungi using Thermo Scientific™ Remel™ Sodium Citrate 2.94%. Kubica et al. described the N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) method and is the most widely used procedure for digestion and decontamination of clinical specimens1. Reep and Kaplan further investigated the NAC method for the recovery of fungi2. They demonstrated that prior to the inoculation of mycological media, NAC could be used with sodium citrate as a diluent to liquefy specimens.”
Toxicity information is “not available”:
thermo-scientific-chemicals-sodium-citrate-m-buffer-soln-ph-
AAJ62918AP AAJ62918AK: Citrate, is used as an anticoagulant and also used as a biological buffer. It is often used to prepare sodium citrate buffer for antigen retrieval of tissue samples. The citrate solution is designed to break protein cross-links, thus, unmasking antigens and epitopes in formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissue sections, resulting in enhancing staining intensity of antibodies. Citrate has anticoagulant activity and as a calcium chelator, it forms complexes that disrupt the tendency of blood to clot. This Thermo Scientific Chemicals brand product was originally part of the Alfa Aesar product portfolio. Some documentation and label information may refer to the legacy brand. The original Alfa Aesar product / item code or SKU reference has not changed as a part of the brand transition to Thermo Scientific Chemicals.
According to its dafety data sheet, “Uses advised against Food, drug, pesticide or biocidal product use.”
The following sounds a bit trickier to me, but you might be able to help me out:
thermo-scientific-chemicals-sodium-citrate-m-buffer-soln-ph-
AAJ63199AK AAJ63199AP: Sodium citrate is commonly used in nucleic acid hybridization techniques at concentrations ranging from 0.1X to 20X depending on the application. It is used to facilitate transfer of nucleic acids to membranes in southern and northern blotting, dot blotting, and colony and plaque lifts.
This Thermo Scientific Chemicals brand product was originally part of the Alfa Aesar product portfolio. Some documentation and label information may refer to the legacy brand. The original Alfa Aesar product / item code or SKU reference has not changed as a part of the brand transition to Thermo Scientific Chemicals.
Its safety data sheet advises against using it in food, drug, pesticide or biocidal products.
This one absorbs polyetholene glycols:
gold-nanoparticles-nm-supplied-in-mgml-sodium-citrate-with-stabilizer-thermo-scientific-chemicals
AAJ67066AC AAJ67066AE: For adsorption of thiolated ligands such as oligonucleotides and polyethylene glycols. Also, due to the increased stability, these gold nanoparticles are ideal for use in physical and optical applications.
This Thermo Scientific Chemicals brand product was originally part of the Alfa Aesar product portfolio. Some documentation and label information may refer to the legacy brand. The original Alfa Aesar product / item code or SKU reference has not changed as a part of the brand transition to Thermo Scientific Chemicals.
Its safety report advises against in food, drug, pesticide or biocidal products:
The safety hazards are not much different at PubChem:
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Sodium-Citrate#section=Safety-and-Hazards.
Toxicity report there warns about alkalosis and hypercalcemia, and the acute effects in mice, rabbits, and rats are quite spectacular: BEHAVIORAL: CONVULSIONS OR EFFECT ON SEIZURE THRESHOLD; LUNGS, THORAX, OR RESPIRATION: CYANOSIS; GASTROINTESTINAL: CHANGES IN STRUCTURE OR FUNCTION OF SALIVARY GLANDS
First aid measures look quite uniform for these products, except for the first one. Hazard classifications, including the first one’s, suggest “Classification under 2012 OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)”
Trying to get beyond page one, however, truncates the search to “sodium,” with 2,297 results… I tried Microsoft Edge, Firefox, and Brave, and couldn’t get any further.
Anyway, if the product is not tainted, it is potentially useful for nanoparticle-poisoning. However, the dosage, long-term use, and its interaction with other common chemicals, especially in the body, remain subject to further scrutiny. I would specifically emphasize the significance of long-term protein modification, especially in enzymes, and DNA manipulation.
What are your conclusions?9
It’s always your responsibility whether you make a decision or not. (Source: https://www.outofstress.com/quotes-on-taking-responsibility/)
Since the end of May, 2023, it has been legal to “vaccinate” the population through the food supply:
Although I have known about the scam surrounding Omega-3, the following source sums it up just fine:
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/omega-3-supplement-is-soy-carcinogens
Here are a few old-fashioned poisons:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/old-and-fabled-toxins-for-the-public
I have written about invented illnesses exhaustively:
https://substack.com/search/invented%20illnesses?focusedPublicationId=877783&searching=focused_posts
I first expressed my concern on September 10, 2022:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/to-eat-or-not-to-eat
Let me introduce a farce here. Methylene blue can detoxify B12. MB is marketed as a miracle drug that is remarkable “for its potential in neuroprotection and mitochondrial support. Research has shown that it possesses antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic properties, making it a promising candidate for various neurological disorders”:
https://www.pccarx.com/Blog/methylene-blue-from-textile-dye-to-potential-clinical-wonder
It’s good against cyanide, so it neutralizes vitamin B12!
More about MB from the same author:
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/methylene-blue-is-toxic-waste-from
Karl, who when he first introduced the subject also cautioned his readers, but disliked it, when I did the same. He has been entertaining his readers with microscopic images ever since, which is not any more convincing than the obviously-fraudulent virologists’ method that also convinces its followers with such images.
While Karl’s reaction to my concerns convinced me one way, if you want to try some, the stuff is cheap: $14.99 for a pound and a half at https://anthonysgoods.com/products/premium-sodium-citrate-food-grade-non-gmo or $17.99 for 14oz on Amazon (https://www.amazon.com/Citrate-Gluten-Free-Certified-Molecular-Gastronomy/dp/B00BLPNMYY).
I sometimes look at the ingredient labels for various food products and like most doctors these days, I am baffled. I have started looking at the chemicals in vitamins, which I take daily. Some of those ingredients are kind of iffy to me. Like sunflower seed oil in K2-M7? Seed oils are supposed to be harmful, but is this?
I never take any big pharma drugs, not even OTC, except in extreme cases. I think all big pharma drugs are substances that can murder your body and therefore kill you. I don't regularly come into contact with many household and cosmetic products. I have bought a few "green" cleaning products, but I am no chemist.
What about herbs? I take several in tincture form and would guess these to be mostly safe. Certainly better than any big pharma garbage.
The vitamin thing needs further thinking and investigation. It would be a money saver to give them up or at least most of them. Like a knucklehead, I would read an article about this vitamin or that mineral and then go buy some. Is there any truth to this vitamin thing or is it another example of being marketed to death?
The real problem is that no matter what you are eating, you don't really know what amounts, if any, of vitamins and minerals you are getting and putting to good use. You can test for some but not most. But that can be inconclusive. I guess since I am not dead nearing age 74, I am doing a few things right. But which ones? I have no clue and neither does medical science or anyone else.
I have been reading Agent's articles too for the last few weeks. It helped me make the final decision not to take anymore vitamin supplements. I stopped taking them about a year ago. I have doubted vitamins for years because they are synthetic lab made products.
I think I will stick to my Turmeric, Ashwaghanda, etc... I buy the whole root and grind it in a blender. It may not be totally free of metals and poisons either because who knows what is in the soil where they grow??
I also have some extracts of turmeric, maca root, ashwaghanda, etc...and I may not take those anymore because who knows what poisonous chemicals were used in the extraction process? Damn near everything in our world is poisonous these days.