Into the Light

Montagnier as Introduced by Ehret

Sometimes things that don’t glitter can be gold

Matthew Ehret published an article sometime in 2022, which wouldn’t bother me, but a well-meaning reader used it as a definitive source, so I was compelled to investigate, and it was well worth my time to devote attention to the following text:

https://risingtidefoundation.net/2022/02/10/dr-luc-montagnier-and-the-coming-revolutions-in-optical-biophysics/

A good while ago, I stopped reading Ehret, and the article soon showed me why. For example, the following statement suffices for an explanation:

“Many of those cells are made up of bacteria, and much of the DNA and RNA within those cells is made up of viruses (mostly dormant), but which can be activated/deactivated by a variety of methods both chemical and electromagnetic.”

This time, I refused to be deterred, which taught me a lesson about sometimes giving up too fast.

Normally, I am abhorred, when I read something like the previous quote, which does contain pure nonsense, but sounds sophisticated enough to mislead quite a few... Too many partial truths...

Still, Ehret’s article provides a prominent example that I can learn a lot from people with whom I don’t completely agree. In the following, I will share the thoughts the article generated for me.

Water molecules might even serve as the communication agent between all organic forms of life, and perhaps even in the maintenance of natural order. The only way such a thing can happen, no matter what the medium is, through wave emission and tuning in to particular frequencies. Any type of common molecules might be doing the job as long as it transfers waves that synchronizes resonance between the sender and the receiver. Perhaps even pure waves can do the job, although last time I checked, even the nature of light remains controversial in current scientific paradigms that resort to the particle or to the wave model as needed. Resonance has been shown to play a part between organic tissue with identical functions, but from different origins after blood transfusions. Blood has been proven to have a “memory,” and I assume the same about the “immune system”:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-makes-people-sick-apart-from

My theory turns out to be quite compatible with a number of proven research findings.

In Terrain Theory, after poisoning and deficiency, resonance is the third cause of disease, which is a common denominator between Bechamp and Montagnier, enhancing the chances for further developing medical R&D in a direction that might actually work. Gurwitsch’s finding that cell-division (mitosis) usually generates UV light is a welcome addendum, although it hasn’t produced any usable knowledge beyond suggesting that Bechamp’s resonance factor probably operates at many frequencies. I love Fritz Popp’s finding that “Measuring the photon activity from cancerous vs healthy liver cell growth is a striking way to clearly see that cancerous growth coincides with exponential photon emissions while healthy liver photon emissions are very stable.” Still, then what? He found that when he “brought two biological samples into proximity, things became additionally interesting as the ‘rhythm’ of their photon emissions synchronized beautifully when close together and fell out of sync when separated. This was outlined in his paper On the Coherence of Biophotons.” Popp concluded that light can be therapeutic, and it is, at least to the point that it is used by therapists¹. As it seems that the same therapeutic impact can be used at various frequencies, the only question is when to use which? Apparently, there has been significant advances in that department, although the personal and environmental variables can be sometimes too confusing.

Bopp was obviously over-confident (a common dead end even among geniuses, who overextend the applicability of their most important achievements), when he stated, “Light can initiate, or arrest, cascade-like reactions in the cells, and that genetic cellular damage can be virtually repaired, within hours, by faint beams of light. We are still on the threshold of fully understanding the complex relationship between light and life, but we can now say, emphatically that the function of our entire metabolism is dependent on light.” If that was exclusively true, people up north without much natural light for months should be all dead…

It looks like resonance can induce mutation, too. “A.B. Burlakov … found that the ultra weak light emissions emanating from two sets of fertilised fish eggs separated by a glass demonstrated a powerful harmonizing effect. If one set of eggs were older, then the younger eggs would mature and develop much faster if brought into proximity. However if the age difference between the two sets were too great, then the scientist found that the younger set would see a higher rate of death, deformities and retardation of development.” Of course, “ultra weak light emissions” were only singled out out of a large number of other variables, and verification is only possible, if similar “emissions” can be emulated and generate the same results under a variety of conditions.

The simplicity of the tools is underwhelming compared with the complexity of a human being, but I’m sure there is some applicability of the findings. Even medieval “doctors” managed to “heal” patients, despite using their totally mythical paradigm, and there is some light at the end of the tunnel this time. As for applying the wrong logic, nobody is exempt. Prescribing “antibiotics to treat autism” serves as a good example of erratic, but functional treatment. Antibiotics reset the gut flora, which gives the patient a chance to start over, and also suggests that “autism” (one of the most prominent invented illnesses “diagnosed” from symptoms) can be linked to the equilibrium in the gut flora:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/prebiotics-and-probiotics-as-parts

Proteins and, perhaps especially, enzymes, seem to play a central role in issuing alerts and initiating biochemical processes in the whole body, leaving ample room for common conditions that have creative names, mostly blaming the patient:

Of course, besides the impact of light, the full spectrum of waves must be examined.

I disagree with details in Ehret’s article, but commend the endeavor and the progress over the currently prevalent trend in “Medicine”; further experiments can promise more results.

Studying “the intersection of light and magnetic fields within the micro-states of living cells” promises even more. May I add sound waves as well?

However, identifying and analyzing common denominators between “remedies” that happen to work to a certain extent is where the real challenge begins. Diagnosing conditions of cells by light emission and absorption, perhaps combined with spectography, is certainly a step forward from the antediluvian practices in modern “Medicine.” As a cautionary sign, the following factor must be also considered from the article itself:

“There are approximately 40 trillion highly differentiated cells in the average human body, each performing very specific functions and requiring an immense field of coherence and intercommunication.”

And that observation doesn’t even include the inevitability of systematic and dynamic links and interactions between those cells, organizing themselves at several layers of complexity, and the whole resulting in the miracle of the functional human being.

So, again, despite some progress, the diagnostic equipment is incredibly primitive in comparison with the system it’s supposed to examine and manipulate². That doesn’t prove it wrong, but it certainly shows that stepping forward will take a lot more research and even more thinking³.

It is a telltale sign of Montagnier’s practice that he was using the traditional western paradigm for diagnosing illness, which is substantiated in Ehret’s following statement:

“With these insights in mind, Montagnier has discovered that many of the frequencies of EM emissions from a wide variety of microbial DNA is also found in the blood plasmas of patients suffering from influenza A, Hepatitis C, and even many neurological diseases not commonly thought of as bacteria-influenced such as Parkinson’s, Multiple Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Alzheimers.”

Of course, viral transmission and pathogenic viruses are myths. What Montagnier discovered are most likely symptoms. As in the case of “viruses,” symptoms are often nominated to be the causes of illnesses. However, it’s rarely observed that symptoms can contribute to an illness in a self-generating loop.

The suggestion that there is “A New Domain of Thinking” and it is a reason “Why Big Pharma Should Be Afraid” is risible at best, and intentionally misleading at worst. After perusing Ehret’s text, I am hopeful, but not in a laughing mood.

DNA collection is now possible through 5G towers:

1. Success, unfortunately, cannot be measured by the patient’s recovery, because the method competes with the body’s natural healing process as well as the placebo-effect. I’m unaware of any statistically significant findings that eliminate the other two possibilities.

2. Diagnostics is one of the Achilles’ heels in modern “Medicine”:

3. The complexity of the system, the human being, has enough variables to prevent human minds to ever fully understand it, so running it in simulations in highly-advanced self-improving AI systems is the only way to make progress. As it turns out, such research opens up a virtually unlimited ways to cause harm, and the study of weaponized applications seems to dominate.