I read her article and to me, non-scientist, it looks like a 180. What I can't make out is whether she did more research and changed her mind accordingly or just changed her mind. The Pfizer documents after all did not turn up yesterday.
My impression is that it is time for her to "bring the truth" that is about to be revealed, anyway. She must have read Ana Maria Mihalcea, although I preceded Ana by a year or two. The fact that Kingston is using my terminology suggests that she may have plagiarized from me. If she had give me credit, I wouldn't be offended, but being muzzled by her paywall is humiliating. She can read me (and she seems to be, along with hundreds of other "authors") and comment on my pieces for free.
I'm confused... what have I missed? I dont follow Kingston (and it sounds like it wouldnt be able to see it without paying anyway). What has she done a 180 on or changed her mind on?
Has this broad finally realized there are no viruses or lab-leaks or is she still talking about bio-weapons escaping or being released?
Ive watched some of her older stuff on Bitchute, but it quickly felt like the same fear porn & bullshit that the "other side" engages in. Felt very rehearsed and scripted. Im suspicious of her - seems like either CO or a useful idiot. (I'm also not interested in listening to someone present research and CONSTANTLY bring their religious dogma into it and waiting for a savior that somehow never comes - which is my biggest issue with these people and is why things never change - always waiting for someone else to deal with it... I believe there is a creator, but I cannot stand religion).
I would assume that Substackers would not be finicky about other Substackers reading and commenting them. It serves a purpose and a good one.
As it is it seems that the wealthier Substackers can freely exploit the less wealthy, an ugly thought to me. Moreover it is THE mechanism that has brought us all to this dreary pass.
What are we to expect of the next phase of our civilization (if we believe in a next phase at all) if we haven't diagnosed the worst disease of this one, it being GREED and position according to financial power?
As I'm familiar with the statistics, "thousands and thousands of paid subscribers" could only be financed from the black budget. Some are bots and others are agents. Useful idiots wouldn't amount to "thousands."
BTW isn't it hilarious that she ends her article with that particular quote from the Gospel according to Luke (11:46-47)? Talking about the sins of the fathers and she picking her own?
At the bottom of the monumental lying we have witnessed for over three years now is that eclectic use of the Bible which characterizes our civilization like nothing else ever will. The Holy Bible will serve anybody any cause any time with exactly the right quote.
To a certain extent, more than probably, but definitely not altogether. I addressed the problem in, because the idea as a generalization is certainly disinfo:
I will have a look later. But what is 'smart'? Does AI even get close?
As for the claims on mRNA I figure they're pretty similar to the experiences of those injecting foreign blood (from other mammals) into humans at the turn of the 20thC. So known about for a long time.
yep...you are ahead of the curve...that's why we're here, hanging around on your awesome stacks. I've been there too, especially in my other (primary) field of research - The Alien Agenda. I keep hoping that it will take some heat and gang-stalking off of me...haven't been so lucky...
Just know we look just as forward to "your" sharings as anyone else's. We know who is bringing it.
And, we thank, profusely, for all your amazing work.
It’s about time you got some recognition. You are one smart cookie Ray! Yeah everybody wants you to pay now for important info people can use to save themselves or their loved ones...it’s sad. I always appreciate your knowledge and viewpoints.
I mean if it was some light and fluffy info or maybe political info and they are charging that’s one thing, but they are charging for important medical information that people could use...kinda cruel. But I get it, nothing is free...I don’t deny them making money but it’s tough to pay a $75 a year subscription to your favorites, of which I have quite a few. Just wish they would all use the “buy me a coffee” deal. How is that going for you?
I see so much good stuff on your prior Substacks and I need to go back and review, yes you are cutting edge on all this stuff...either you have excellent research skills or you are that smart 😂 I’ll contribute here and there. I think the only other ones I do are Clandestine, Dr Alexander and Expose the Darkness. I super like Sasha Latypova too. She’s the real deal.
As far as I can see, I can put two and two together from several decades apart, but the deductive approach also helps.
Laputova is pushing mRNA, but other than that, she is also publishing valuable info. Dunno about the rest, unless you mean Exposing the Darkness. Her "Headline News" are extremely misleading, but the daily article is not bad. Haven't encountered the other two.
Thank you for opening up the "buy me a coffee" version. At this point, it has brought in $225, but I've also lost three paid subscriptions. That's fine, because BMAC charges only 10%, as opposed to the 20% here.
I'm thinking about compiling a monthly report with screen prt about my current income. This month, it was $425 minus commission, which is about $13 a day, out of which $6.60 comes from subscriptions.
Obviously, I need other sources of income, but they are diminishing quickly.
She was rude to me and I simply included our conversation in the article as an example of possible quackery, because she refused to come up with any evidence except marketing texts from sites that were selling the stuff. We banned each other after that, but on May 6, 2023, the one-year anniversary of my site, I issued a "general amnesty," (I think, it was three people) and I haven't had to ban anyone yet. Of course, I will, if I have to, because the comment sections make up much of the value on my site and I won't tolerate comments that deter readers.
During the 12 months, I have encountered a number of trolls/bots/humans whose train had left the tracks. The latest ones are extremely smart and sophisticated. In this article, I’ll refer to such trolls/bots/humans as Entities, which I will abbreviate as EY.
How do EY operate?
1. EY usually gives you something first in order to gain your trust;
2. floods comment sections with irrelevant, confusing, or misleading comments in order to make the sections unreadable;
3. employs mind-bending tricks in order to exhaust the reader and force them into brainless submission;
5. isolates and decontextualizes contents in order to be able to use straw man arguments and false analogies;
6. EY never completes its arguments in order to make sure the process can never end; when forced into completing an argument, it tends to attack you ad hominem (sometimes going as far as posting long diatribes) or, on preferred occasions, politely vanishes;
7. eventually, it tries to discredit you in order to get rid of an opponent of the official narrative that they actually serve.
I have followed Karen Kingston since her first interview on the Brannon Howse show. She has been telling people to stop calling it a vaccine and call it what it is for a very long time. She said it is the COVID bio-weapon countermeasure. Countermeasure is something the military uses against an enemy and WE are the enemy.
What else did she say that I didn't up to a year before she did?
Coming out with the "truth" that most people know by then is the latest, extremely intelligent strategy to make people regain trust and hope, when there is nobody to trust and definitely nothing to hope for, but it surely delays people's reaction:
Sounds feasible, but I suspect that the elites haven't lived in this country at least since 9/11. The enablers and enforcers are offered sufficient protection in case of a popular uprising; they cannot be touched, but even their location is a mystery (doubles/deepfakes are used all the time).
Controlled demolition is only important, if some of the country is supposed to survive and can be transitioned into technocracy. Still, the food/energy riots are realistic options before the end of the year.
They have their backups. Not everyone is on the commoners' grid. They can always disable a few reactors. Unless they deploy some extremely drastic form of poisoning and sell it as a new plandemic or a Russian/Chinese/alien attack, the depopulation will be slow for their agenda.
It's only a flick of the switch and who knows what does and what doesn't stay on the grid.
Spent fuel and rods are definitely a problem. Depleted uranium missiles have been only one way of discarding them. According to Dmitri Orlov, the Russians have the tech to recycle nuclear waste and they are even doing it in France.
Fukushima must have already been intentional (the tsunami combined with the flawed design, that is). According to Orlov, even Chernobyl was and, based on what I have learnt about globalist cooperation, that is possible. Turkey and the blown-up island on the Pacific suggest that HAARP can work such wonders. The nuclear scare itself might be only another scam:
I normally don't read Karen, because it upsets me too much. I am not in touch with her, either.
The two articles suggest that the "virus" exists, so they are moot.
As for the first link, carcinogens are everywhere, with ionizing radiation becoming immediate threats to life after the massive 5G installations and the data-collecting satellite network:
Email her and let her know. Just for fun. They hate finding out X amount later.
I don't think I would like to get in touch with her, even if she read my e-mail. Something might rub off from her that I wouldn't like. :)
A game of who is the person in the fox hole with me.
I read her article and to me, non-scientist, it looks like a 180. What I can't make out is whether she did more research and changed her mind accordingly or just changed her mind. The Pfizer documents after all did not turn up yesterday.
My impression is that it is time for her to "bring the truth" that is about to be revealed, anyway. She must have read Ana Maria Mihalcea, although I preceded Ana by a year or two. The fact that Kingston is using my terminology suggests that she may have plagiarized from me. If she had give me credit, I wouldn't be offended, but being muzzled by her paywall is humiliating. She can read me (and she seems to be, along with hundreds of other "authors") and comment on my pieces for free.
I'm confused... what have I missed? I dont follow Kingston (and it sounds like it wouldnt be able to see it without paying anyway). What has she done a 180 on or changed her mind on?
Has this broad finally realized there are no viruses or lab-leaks or is she still talking about bio-weapons escaping or being released?
Ive watched some of her older stuff on Bitchute, but it quickly felt like the same fear porn & bullshit that the "other side" engages in. Felt very rehearsed and scripted. Im suspicious of her - seems like either CO or a useful idiot. (I'm also not interested in listening to someone present research and CONSTANTLY bring their religious dogma into it and waiting for a savior that somehow never comes - which is my biggest issue with these people and is why things never change - always waiting for someone else to deal with it... I believe there is a creator, but I cannot stand religion).
I see.
I would assume that Substackers would not be finicky about other Substackers reading and commenting them. It serves a purpose and a good one.
As it is it seems that the wealthier Substackers can freely exploit the less wealthy, an ugly thought to me. Moreover it is THE mechanism that has brought us all to this dreary pass.
What are we to expect of the next phase of our civilization (if we believe in a next phase at all) if we haven't diagnosed the worst disease of this one, it being GREED and position according to financial power?
Those who allow only "paid subscribers" to comment may not like antagonizing views.
Katherine Watt has been at least closing down all comments... Infinitely more honest...
Paid subscribers can be a pain in the ... as well, don't you think?
As I'm familiar with the statistics, "thousands and thousands of paid subscribers" could only be financed from the black budget. Some are bots and others are agents. Useful idiots wouldn't amount to "thousands."
Yeah, I forgot that black part.
BTW isn't it hilarious that she ends her article with that particular quote from the Gospel according to Luke (11:46-47)? Talking about the sins of the fathers and she picking her own?
At the bottom of the monumental lying we have witnessed for over three years now is that eclectic use of the Bible which characterizes our civilization like nothing else ever will. The Holy Bible will serve anybody any cause any time with exactly the right quote.
Maybe the gene editing tech is bullshit.
To a certain extent, more than probably, but definitely not altogether. I addressed the problem in, because the idea as a generalization is certainly disinfo:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/intelligent-trolls-are-now-saying
I will have a look later. But what is 'smart'? Does AI even get close?
As for the claims on mRNA I figure they're pretty similar to the experiences of those injecting foreign blood (from other mammals) into humans at the turn of the 20thC. So known about for a long time.
On "mRNA damages":
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/covid-mrnas-are-nothing-more-than
On the link between humans and AI:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/zombie-armies
yep...you are ahead of the curve...that's why we're here, hanging around on your awesome stacks. I've been there too, especially in my other (primary) field of research - The Alien Agenda. I keep hoping that it will take some heat and gang-stalking off of me...haven't been so lucky...
Just know we look just as forward to "your" sharings as anyone else's. We know who is bringing it.
And, we thank, profusely, for all your amazing work.
Thank you for valuing my work so highly. As you know, my wife is helping a lot and the site wouldn't be the same without her contribution. :)
It’s about time you got some recognition. You are one smart cookie Ray! Yeah everybody wants you to pay now for important info people can use to save themselves or their loved ones...it’s sad. I always appreciate your knowledge and viewpoints.
Actually, the payment option is a trap. Once people invest in something, they have a hard time to realize they've been had.
That's why everything is free on my site. :)
I mean if it was some light and fluffy info or maybe political info and they are charging that’s one thing, but they are charging for important medical information that people could use...kinda cruel. But I get it, nothing is free...I don’t deny them making money but it’s tough to pay a $75 a year subscription to your favorites, of which I have quite a few. Just wish they would all use the “buy me a coffee” deal. How is that going for you?
I see so much good stuff on your prior Substacks and I need to go back and review, yes you are cutting edge on all this stuff...either you have excellent research skills or you are that smart 😂 I’ll contribute here and there. I think the only other ones I do are Clandestine, Dr Alexander and Expose the Darkness. I super like Sasha Latypova too. She’s the real deal.
As far as I can see, I can put two and two together from several decades apart, but the deductive approach also helps.
Laputova is pushing mRNA, but other than that, she is also publishing valuable info. Dunno about the rest, unless you mean Exposing the Darkness. Her "Headline News" are extremely misleading, but the daily article is not bad. Haven't encountered the other two.
Look, there is literally nothing on Kingston that is not available for free on my site, and a LOT earlier.
As nobody really knows "medical" stuff (too many types of poisoning), they cannot charge for information, although bottom-feeders certainly abound:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/is-healing-a-myth-altogether
Thank you for opening up the "buy me a coffee" version. At this point, it has brought in $225, but I've also lost three paid subscriptions. That's fine, because BMAC charges only 10%, as opposed to the 20% here.
I'm thinking about compiling a monthly report with screen prt about my current income. This month, it was $425 minus commission, which is about $13 a day, out of which $6.60 comes from subscriptions.
Obviously, I need other sources of income, but they are diminishing quickly.
Join the club!
Never for a minute did I imagine I would ever make minimum wage. :)
She was rude to me and I simply included our conversation in the article as an example of possible quackery, because she refused to come up with any evidence except marketing texts from sites that were selling the stuff. We banned each other after that, but on May 6, 2023, the one-year anniversary of my site, I issued a "general amnesty," (I think, it was three people) and I haven't had to ban anyone yet. Of course, I will, if I have to, because the comment sections make up much of the value on my site and I won't tolerate comments that deter readers.
I've also published the common offenses in:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/intelligent-trolls-are-now-saying
and in
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/this-site-needs-your-help
The-Crypto-Rationalist also recommended the following excellent page:
https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=1388
The first article summarizes the threat:
During the 12 months, I have encountered a number of trolls/bots/humans whose train had left the tracks. The latest ones are extremely smart and sophisticated. In this article, I’ll refer to such trolls/bots/humans as Entities, which I will abbreviate as EY.
How do EY operate?
1. EY usually gives you something first in order to gain your trust;
2. floods comment sections with irrelevant, confusing, or misleading comments in order to make the sections unreadable;
3. employs mind-bending tricks in order to exhaust the reader and force them into brainless submission;
5. isolates and decontextualizes contents in order to be able to use straw man arguments and false analogies;
6. EY never completes its arguments in order to make sure the process can never end; when forced into completing an argument, it tends to attack you ad hominem (sometimes going as far as posting long diatribes) or, on preferred occasions, politely vanishes;
7. eventually, it tries to discredit you in order to get rid of an opponent of the official narrative that they actually serve.
Exactly.
It's OK to pay for something, just make sure you're getting your money's worth. If you have to think about it, you are probably not.
I have followed Karen Kingston since her first interview on the Brannon Howse show. She has been telling people to stop calling it a vaccine and call it what it is for a very long time. She said it is the COVID bio-weapon countermeasure. Countermeasure is something the military uses against an enemy and WE are the enemy.
It was obvious from the beginning...
What else did she say that I didn't up to a year before she did?
Coming out with the "truth" that most people know by then is the latest, extremely intelligent strategy to make people regain trust and hope, when there is nobody to trust and definitely nothing to hope for, but it surely delays people's reaction:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-do-lies-become-the-truth
Her making people pay for her platitudes is only another way to make sure her followers will lag behind in realizing what's going on.
If she was for real, she would cross-post my article about what’s coming up next and that, for that matter, will end all subsequent post by her:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/this-is-how-it-will-go-down
Sounds feasible, but I suspect that the elites haven't lived in this country at least since 9/11. The enablers and enforcers are offered sufficient protection in case of a popular uprising; they cannot be touched, but even their location is a mystery (doubles/deepfakes are used all the time).
Controlled demolition is only important, if some of the country is supposed to survive and can be transitioned into technocracy. Still, the food/energy riots are realistic options before the end of the year.
They have their backups. Not everyone is on the commoners' grid. They can always disable a few reactors. Unless they deploy some extremely drastic form of poisoning and sell it as a new plandemic or a Russian/Chinese/alien attack, the depopulation will be slow for their agenda.
It's only a flick of the switch and who knows what does and what doesn't stay on the grid.
Spent fuel and rods are definitely a problem. Depleted uranium missiles have been only one way of discarding them. According to Dmitri Orlov, the Russians have the tech to recycle nuclear waste and they are even doing it in France.
Fukushima must have already been intentional (the tsunami combined with the flawed design, that is). According to Orlov, even Chernobyl was and, based on what I have learnt about globalist cooperation, that is possible. Turkey and the blown-up island on the Pacific suggest that HAARP can work such wonders. The nuclear scare itself might be only another scam:
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/download/hiroshima-revisited.pdf
The current timetable is only for ten years, which sounds remarkably rapid to me. Time will tell.
They certainly combine a single event into multiple outcomes:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/four-birds-with-one-stone-the-derailment
I normally don't read Karen, because it upsets me too much. I am not in touch with her, either.
The two articles suggest that the "virus" exists, so they are moot.
As for the first link, carcinogens are everywhere, with ionizing radiation becoming immediate threats to life after the massive 5G installations and the data-collecting satellite network:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-you-want-to-know-your-radiation
The second link is answered by Mihalcea, who is only confirming what I've been saying for about two years:
https://mothman777.substack.com/p/covid-mrnas-are-nothing-more-than
You see, this type of comment only reveals you for what you are, so I am leaving it where it is. :)
The original message was from Rob (c137), quoted from the e-mail I received about it:
"Who cares you crying about credit. Fuck you"
He deleted it, so I am going to do the same in a few hours.