More News about the Same Old?
Not exactly.
No, I’m not exactly fond of Voltaire, but this time, he hits the nail on the head.
At one point, I hoped to establish a tradition that would follow up on the week’s events in a sarcastic, sardonic, or at least ironical manner. The only time I managed was:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-fountain-of-good-news-your-weekly
On other occasions, I tried to entertain in alternative ways:
I would need a LOT of help, but even my wife is busy with her garden and other commitments, so she can barely contribute these days. However, this is her finding:
So, expensive real estate is burnt to the ground.
The MSM puts it down to “lighting strikes,” although lighting rarely strikes twice, and when it does, one might wonder:
The event wasn’t all that different from Maui, after which people accepted to be gaslighted, and nobody was made responsible. At that time, I started a discussion:
Weekend Topic for Discussion: What Happened on Maui?
David (https://drp314.substack.com/) came up with the topic, and I believe it’s a good idea. So many people have written about it that I couldn’t have added anything new, but collecting data seems like a good idea. SAVE OUR SOVEREIGNTY https://saveoursovereignty.substack.com/
The “truth,” when it came to changing anything, of course, made no difference, as usual.
https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/usfs/map/
Was it a need for valuable real estate, as in Maui? Possibly, but you remember that the globalist plan usually uses a single event for multiple purposes, and multiple events for making progress. So, besides the real estate scam, increasing homelessness (dependency on the “government”)
Surprisingly, Katherine Watt, an excellent legal analyst in a world where the “law” only applies to the government-owned tax donkeys, and there is no legal solution1, because all courts are owned, just stepped out of her comfort zone, and is asking a question that I’ve been asking for a long time:
Why were the soldiers poisoned with the (sooner-or-later) lethal injections? I originally figured that it was about the introduction of the remotely-controllable zombie armies, but Kat’s guess about disabling national defenses also makes sense. She also published a respectable summary of the US bioweapon program before:
After all, most of the military-age invaders of the US in recent years are likely to end up to be trained against the general population (which they had been conditioned to hate) and/or act as “UN peacekeepers” without ever having to fire a gun, because robo-soldiers and drones will do the job for them. They will be there only to secure the already-progressing foreign occupation of the United States.
“Agent” also informed readers about
Not that I haven’t written about this nearly two years ago,
No Need for Any More "Vaccinations"!
Technology has reached amazing levels. “Vaccines” can now be aerosolized, administered through a patch, or implanted in a “covid” test, but it turns out, there is a more romantic and, possibly cheaper and faster, way to produce the same result! The idea of informed consent has been moot for decades, so nothing really changes.
But I didn’t have to reinvent the wheel; the data was already out there:
And it’s a lot more than insects:
https://arizonaskywatch.com/article/articles/nanoweapons%20mass%20destruction.pdf
Legislations going against guns is no news, but Massachussetts is innovating:
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/nra-to-challenge-new-massachusetts-gun-law/
The legislation passed the Massachusetts House with a 124-33 vote and the Senate by 35-5, NBC Boston reported. Opposition included a handful of Democrats who joined all Republicans in voting against the bill. The vote demonstrates how overhwhelmingly Democrat and politically unbalanced the state is. Among the dissenters were Sen. Marc Pacheco of Taunton and Reps. Colleen Garry of Dracut, Patricia Haddad of Somerset, Kathy LaNatra of Kingston, David Robertson of Tewksbury, Alan Silvia of Fall River, Jeff Turco of Winthrop, Jonathan Zlotnik of Gardner and Independent Rep. Susannah Whipps of Athol.
The law’s new definition of “assault-style firearms” includes semiautomatic shotguns, and any semiautomatic centerfire rifle or pistol with the ability to accept a detachable feeding device and featuring at least two specific characteristics. These features include a folding or telescopic stock, a thumbhole stock or pistol grip, a forward grip, a threaded barrel designed for a flash suppressor or muzzle brake, or a shroud encircling part of the barrel to shield the bearer’s hand from heat.
Of course, Americans would never give up their guns. Even many Canadians and most likely didn’t, waiting for their doomsday application:
More about Using Your 2nd-Amendment Rights
This much, and more, should be clear even after my first article.
Not that these guns that are toys compared with the drones and robotic armies would make much difference, but they might secure leaving this world as a human being.
The way these events pertain doesn’t suggest that history repeats itself: humans do, due to their nature. The constant reiteration could be a farce, but the joke is on the disempowered, who are still desperately seeking some power, some witchcraft, some magic, some political or legal savior, while they are already sitting in a pond ignored by their “leaders,” while the water temperature is slowly rising.
Perhaps not-so-strangely, old problems keep prevailing, and somewhat embarrassingly, they are presented as new. Or is it again the old globalist habit of taunting the defenseless victims?
She also relies on sources that I do not trust in the least; my final post on mRNA contains our conversation:
The Problem with mRNA: Again, Something You Can't Find Anywhere Else
Here is an example of a question that requires simple logic to answer: “Only one of them is true. Which one?”
There's prime mining land in them thar hills of my western Canada, Ray.
Several well schooled doctors have pointed out that most of the papers on studies in the well known, so-called reputable, medical journals are bull. The research methods are bogus, the conclusions do not jibe with the facts, etc. There is little proof of truth in the world today. We can only conclude that what we "know" may not be the truth, and that we know very little. What we do know is that world governments controlled by super wealthy people (due to unpayable debt) are colluding to destroy humanity, or most of it, for the pleasure and benefit of their masters. They are killing us through various means-- some known, some guessed, some unknown. This mass killing will continue until, or should I say if, the enslaved people of the world rise up in total revolt and kill all (or as many as possible) the pyschos responsible. There will be no peace, no health, no freedom until they are destroyed. And, then, the world must be ever vigilant because these atrocities will happen again.