a good think here! (will have ta mosey on over to the PM story too!) imho the idear that there's a "god gene" IS laffable--but that we are all divine is a given (faith or no faith) BUT....but but.. there is a thing 'r two 'bout the pineal gland an' some say that is "where" we humans have seated our sense of intuition, safety/trust, an' yup... "faith"-- when they do those brainscans for "activity"--the pineal fires up (as duz the hippocampus re. memories) when folks pray or have to engage their full senses when meeting new people... mebbe too in using that elusive entity we'd call "free will" in layman's terms... SO... apart from literally squelchin' (or tryin' ta put down) our biofields--that's our energy, our mojo, our literal auras that are electrical an' extend 'bout 6' around us--they ARE indeed tryin' ta "put out" our third eyes--our pineal glands centered smack dab in the middle of our foreheads.
Think'bout it--the wicked nasal swabs head up ta that "cherce" spot, the temp-takin' deVICES glow on "just" that same spot -- cell phones hit it indirectly, an' of course there are other "veys" that are more remote. So I don't buy inta the vague concept of any ol' "god gene" but I DO think that the pineal (an' hippocampus which retains our memories an' past knowledge--like that men are men an' women are women-not-wyo-men etc) are both bein' hit by their 5G / scalar whattever tech. (An' mebbe too the jabs bad have nanorobots that swim up to "find" that pineal). That's my 2 cents onnit!
ps plum fergot 'bout fluoride which "califies" (calci-FRIES) yer pineal gland--that's in the warter, food, etc etc -- I'll pick a physical target over the imagined one any day
New technologies...overall, is the world any better off with them? Billions are still starving, the techno companies are still in the forefront of the mass murder operations of gates and the WEF. As far as medical technologies, we are sicker than ever. New defense/agression technologies have done nothing but add more wars and murder to the world.
What are these clownish control freaks gonna do when there is nothing left to control? Hopefully die off and leave the planet to the animals and nature.
To me, it looks like less and less "madical" attention is needed for croaking. What may have happened by accident at the time, must have become an experiment on the public first, and part of the depop project later:
Thanks for taking this up Ray esp on the God gene part which I didn't get deep into (I was mostly focused on debunking Reese's BS-more like abject lying-on the the schizo and Parkinson parts). The God gene story though I think is a psyop to discredit religion and to confuse and obfuscate, but could have other side jobs as well. I guess what they want to say is that since religion is just a gene and not needed we can do away with it. Well that will decrease lots of resistance to their one world govt plans. I've always thought Myers-Briggs was a scam just for them to make money and to give HR depts fake reasons to reassign or fire staff. You made good additions to the topic Ray and thanks for reading my post with the interest you did. Keep going!
VMAT schmeemat. VMAT MRNA and gene editing are all way late to the party trying to kill the “God gene”. Vodka does it. Ask me how I know. How long have they been making vodka? Seriously, no human being can kill the so-called God gene because God is the one who puts it there in the first place, iffin you have said gene. If He puts it there, it is there and it stays there, and He’s not going to take it back. He doesn’t make mistakes, lest he wouldn’t be a god worth having.
Thank you, PM; it's good to see we can complement each other's work. It looks like the number of authentic sources is shrinking rapidly, and I am glad to see you remaining untainted. In your comment section, Pirate Studebaker arrived at the same conclusion about Free Will as I did before I published this and read his comment after your article, showing that two thinking persons can arrive at similar conclusions. Quite unusual these days.
The "God gene" project looks like a cover-up for all the technological manipulations described in my text. Blaming Genetics, after all, is also asking the question, "Did God make a mistake?", which again, allows for blaming the victim for being weak, stupid, or both. In "Madicine," that has been going on since the inception of Genetics and patients have been told they had inherited conditions instead of pointing out, or at least researching, toxic exposure that affected a whole family...
Discrediting religion has been on the timetable for decades, infused into feebly minds through popular culture. As you are saying, doing one thing and accomplishing several tasks seems to be a common globalist act and, in my understanding, it's also the signature of the central AI, because calculating all the variables far extends the scope of human intelligence (which is becoming an oxymoron :) ):
In an ideal case, when religion is not used as the prominent cultural ideology to cement a culture together, selecting faith is an existential decision that MUST supersede the animal instinct to survive. For that, however, retaining human dignity can suffice; no religion is needed to realize that there is a threshold for everyone beyond which life is not worth living, as I have experienced it in my life:
I just put this reply on Myers-Briggs to a Note comment but may be helpful here:
The problem with these tests is they are trying to peg people into a category in spite of the fact that the specificity and sensitivity of the test really can’t be measured because the constructs they are purporting to evaluate are subjective, influenced by multiple variables, and there is NO psychiatric trait, diagnosis, or disorder that has any objective physical parameter to be connected to besides substance abuse, they are only lists in the DSM that was made up in a board room. To get some handle on a person you need lots of data seeing them in multiple situations over long periods and interview them directly many times. Tests also do not differentiate personality traits from mild cases of persons who have ADHD, depression, and other symptoms.
From the DSM Task Force members themselves admitting they did not use (and can not use) any science when they made up one of the most misused diagnostic labels second only to viruses: "‘I just don't know what it is’ - but it was a diagnosis that doctors were making....It was only when John Gunderson came up with a paper listing specific characteristics of what he called Borderline Personality Disorder, that we went ‘ah ha – we can put this in book’....While their review is comprehensive in its scope, it does not transcend the usual methodological problems of review-based research, which is susceptible to interpretation bias and unable to control for the multiple variables affecting each study reviewed....We simply discussed things until we were comfortable with it, based on what we as individual members of the group understood and knew. It was really quite primitive compared to what they do now...We didn't know about this. It was all about what we knew from clinical experience and from reading. It was done by consensus of experts, which would now be considered a very trivial approach, but that's the best we could do then....the picture emerges of a Task Force struggling to substantiate its decisions on the basis of solid research...We had very little in the way of data, so we were forced to rely on clinical consensus, which, admittedly, is a very poor way to do things."
a good think here! (will have ta mosey on over to the PM story too!) imho the idear that there's a "god gene" IS laffable--but that we are all divine is a given (faith or no faith) BUT....but but.. there is a thing 'r two 'bout the pineal gland an' some say that is "where" we humans have seated our sense of intuition, safety/trust, an' yup... "faith"-- when they do those brainscans for "activity"--the pineal fires up (as duz the hippocampus re. memories) when folks pray or have to engage their full senses when meeting new people... mebbe too in using that elusive entity we'd call "free will" in layman's terms... SO... apart from literally squelchin' (or tryin' ta put down) our biofields--that's our energy, our mojo, our literal auras that are electrical an' extend 'bout 6' around us--they ARE indeed tryin' ta "put out" our third eyes--our pineal glands centered smack dab in the middle of our foreheads.
Think'bout it--the wicked nasal swabs head up ta that "cherce" spot, the temp-takin' deVICES glow on "just" that same spot -- cell phones hit it indirectly, an' of course there are other "veys" that are more remote. So I don't buy inta the vague concept of any ol' "god gene" but I DO think that the pineal (an' hippocampus which retains our memories an' past knowledge--like that men are men an' women are women-not-wyo-men etc) are both bein' hit by their 5G / scalar whattever tech. (An' mebbe too the jabs bad have nanorobots that swim up to "find" that pineal). That's my 2 cents onnit!
ps plum fergot 'bout fluoride which "califies" (calci-FRIES) yer pineal gland--that's in the warter, food, etc etc -- I'll pick a physical target over the imagined one any day
New technologies...overall, is the world any better off with them? Billions are still starving, the techno companies are still in the forefront of the mass murder operations of gates and the WEF. As far as medical technologies, we are sicker than ever. New defense/agression technologies have done nothing but add more wars and murder to the world.
What are these clownish control freaks gonna do when there is nothing left to control? Hopefully die off and leave the planet to the animals and nature.
Die they shall, but I'm afraid, it's going to be a bit late for everyone else involved:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-will-the-globalists-game-end
To me, it looks like less and less "madical" attention is needed for croaking. What may have happened by accident at the time, must have become an experiment on the public first, and part of the depop project later:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/moving-to-more-uncharted-lands-the
The hour is later than one would like to believe, but must not prevent personal response.
Thanks for taking this up Ray esp on the God gene part which I didn't get deep into (I was mostly focused on debunking Reese's BS-more like abject lying-on the the schizo and Parkinson parts). The God gene story though I think is a psyop to discredit religion and to confuse and obfuscate, but could have other side jobs as well. I guess what they want to say is that since religion is just a gene and not needed we can do away with it. Well that will decrease lots of resistance to their one world govt plans. I've always thought Myers-Briggs was a scam just for them to make money and to give HR depts fake reasons to reassign or fire staff. You made good additions to the topic Ray and thanks for reading my post with the interest you did. Keep going!
VMAT schmeemat. VMAT MRNA and gene editing are all way late to the party trying to kill the “God gene”. Vodka does it. Ask me how I know. How long have they been making vodka? Seriously, no human being can kill the so-called God gene because God is the one who puts it there in the first place, iffin you have said gene. If He puts it there, it is there and it stays there, and He’s not going to take it back. He doesn’t make mistakes, lest he wouldn’t be a god worth having.
Thank you, PM; it's good to see we can complement each other's work. It looks like the number of authentic sources is shrinking rapidly, and I am glad to see you remaining untainted. In your comment section, Pirate Studebaker arrived at the same conclusion about Free Will as I did before I published this and read his comment after your article, showing that two thinking persons can arrive at similar conclusions. Quite unusual these days.
The "God gene" project looks like a cover-up for all the technological manipulations described in my text. Blaming Genetics, after all, is also asking the question, "Did God make a mistake?", which again, allows for blaming the victim for being weak, stupid, or both. In "Madicine," that has been going on since the inception of Genetics and patients have been told they had inherited conditions instead of pointing out, or at least researching, toxic exposure that affected a whole family...
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-bermuda-triangle-of-medications
Discrediting religion has been on the timetable for decades, infused into feebly minds through popular culture. As you are saying, doing one thing and accomplishing several tasks seems to be a common globalist act and, in my understanding, it's also the signature of the central AI, because calculating all the variables far extends the scope of human intelligence (which is becoming an oxymoron :) ):
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-end-game-has-begun-the-mass-murders
In an ideal case, when religion is not used as the prominent cultural ideology to cement a culture together, selecting faith is an existential decision that MUST supersede the animal instinct to survive. For that, however, retaining human dignity can suffice; no religion is needed to realize that there is a threshold for everyone beyond which life is not worth living, as I have experienced it in my life:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freedom-is-what-freedom-does-but
Sometimes I manage to find the proper words, as I may have, when describing Myers-Briggs in this article.
I just put this reply on Myers-Briggs to a Note comment but may be helpful here:
The problem with these tests is they are trying to peg people into a category in spite of the fact that the specificity and sensitivity of the test really can’t be measured because the constructs they are purporting to evaluate are subjective, influenced by multiple variables, and there is NO psychiatric trait, diagnosis, or disorder that has any objective physical parameter to be connected to besides substance abuse, they are only lists in the DSM that was made up in a board room. To get some handle on a person you need lots of data seeing them in multiple situations over long periods and interview them directly many times. Tests also do not differentiate personality traits from mild cases of persons who have ADHD, depression, and other symptoms.
Here see for example how they “made” the diagosis of Borderline Personality, it is abject pseudoscience, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13648470.2016.1226684
From the DSM Task Force members themselves admitting they did not use (and can not use) any science when they made up one of the most misused diagnostic labels second only to viruses: "‘I just don't know what it is’ - but it was a diagnosis that doctors were making....It was only when John Gunderson came up with a paper listing specific characteristics of what he called Borderline Personality Disorder, that we went ‘ah ha – we can put this in book’....While their review is comprehensive in its scope, it does not transcend the usual methodological problems of review-based research, which is susceptible to interpretation bias and unable to control for the multiple variables affecting each study reviewed....We simply discussed things until we were comfortable with it, based on what we as individual members of the group understood and knew. It was really quite primitive compared to what they do now...We didn't know about this. It was all about what we knew from clinical experience and from reading. It was done by consensus of experts, which would now be considered a very trivial approach, but that's the best we could do then....the picture emerges of a Task Force struggling to substantiate its decisions on the basis of solid research...We had very little in the way of data, so we were forced to rely on clinical consensus, which, admittedly, is a very poor way to do things."