"Can Cancer Really Be Cured with Ivermectin and Other Safe, Old Treatments?"

Or is that the wrong question?

Of course, Santa exists, but this DOCTOR doesn’t know that!

---

Dr. Tess Lawrie published the following article yesterday, raising a question that might affect more people than anyone would like:

Can cancer really be cured with ivermectin and other safe, old treatments?

The following source seems to support her findings:

https://www.huldaclark.com/*

There have been remarkable achievements in cancer treatment, but they would fill volumes, so Tess couldn’t address them in a single article, and neither can I. Instead, I’ll focus on the immediate corollaries.

The (sooner-or-later) lethal injections have definitely increased cancer rates, not that cancer was not around before, due to a large number of other toxins and poisonings than the injection that is a newcomer to the show.

The dilemma starts with the fact that “cancer” is a term that is used by “doctors” for a large number of various conditions and chances are it scares the living daylight out of the laymen and commands blind obedience to the “healer” who, incidentally, hardly ever heals. Most people are unaware that everybody has cancerous cells in their body, but the immune system usually handles them successfully…

There is definitely no panacea, and “cancer” treatment must match the type of damage (there is no such single illness as “cancer”) to be treated.

Misdiagnoses are also rampant. In the case of mammograms, for one, failure rate is about 50%, which means that half of the “positive” diagnoses are wrong, while pressing the breasts hard and adding radiation exposure increase the risk of breast cancer**. For “cervical cancer,” the system recently introduced a “Stage 0” cancer, which is also “treated” with harsh and toxic chemicals. In the meanwhile, the “medical” establishment also has obvious conflicts of interest in the game:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-disaster-of-modern-medicine

It looks like the rate of poisoning is now faster than any detox or other forms of emergency interventions can handle some of the time:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-summary-of-general-poisoning

Toxins, parasites, pathogens, and graphenes also add up and some of them even enhance the detrimental effect of others:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/activators

As for radiation exposure, there are quite a few myths about it, and the truth is hard to find:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-you-want-to-know-your-radiation

While everybody is a “doctor”:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/everyone-is-a-doctor

Is healing a myth altogether?

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/is-healing-a-myth-altogether

While some reversed engineering is possible (Ivermectin, for one, is certainly not “horse medication” and it has proven to work for parasitic infections):

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-do-the-perpetrators-protect-themselves

Ultimately, it’s a hit-and-miss.

One thing is certain: you must keep looking and remain cautious:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/you-are-constantly-being-misled

And damages graphenes do are also amplified by 5G and comparable technologies.

A new medical paradigm is sorely needed:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/an-alternative-theory-of-diseases

Of course, you can always “trust the science,” but hopefully, you know the way it works these days:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/freaks-of-science

---

*My problem with the site is that it also sells corresponding products, which is never a good sign that invokes my trust.

**Deodorants, antiperspirants, sunscreens, and other toxic chemicals applied to the skin are probably the main culprits. Statistically, about three percent of women die of breast cancer, irrespective of being treated or not, but chemo certainly increases the casualties among those who accept it. The scary part is that this info is widely available for the public, but the causes of the illness are hardly ever addressed by “doctors” and their victims (patients?) keep accepting the deadly “treatment” that would probably kill healthy people, too (so it is easily possible that many “cancer survivors” were either misdiagnosed or have such a robust immune system that they didn’t need any “treatment”).