“Fewer” criminals would be more grammatical, but I’m sure you are catching my drift.
Those, who “peacefully” want to impose their will on others are serving a criminal agenda.
The following article shows that there is no polite way to talk about gun control:
The following argument is worth considering:
… there’s the fact that Americans use guns to defend themselves about 1.6 million times each year. Those are robberies, rapes, assaults, and murders that are prevented1.
The end result is that rather than protecting people, gun control laws only leave the most vulnerable and disfavored people in society defenseless against the most heartless and savage.
I don’t quite agree with the first predicate, but essentially, the statement applies to those who would submit their weapons: “… if the government banned all guns tomorrow, many people would peacefully turn them in, but that doesn’t mean they’d do it because they wanted to. The people who would comply would only do out of fear of the government sending men with guns to kill them.”
“And the people who don’t comply? We’d be protected by the Fourth Amendment for a while, but if evidence emerges in any way that we still had guns, the government would send men with guns to take them away by force. Anything short of surrendering and going to prison would result in being shot and killed by those men with guns that people like Tretta want to sent after us.”
In short, nobody can tell others about the rights they have. It was true for the toxic muzzles, “tests,” and injections during convid, and it is true now that “saving lives” is a manipulative argument that is usually used for murder in civilian life (in military applications, some troops are sacrificed in order to win a battle):
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-fallacy-of-saving-lives
Of course, “saving” can go a long way. The climate change fraud that is execerbated by chemtrailing wants to “save the Planet,” while it simply uses one tool to accomplish several objectives of Agenda 2030.
Hitting several birds with one stone is a signature of the eugenicists:
More generally, the application of the principle is omnipresent:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-end-game-has-begun-the-mass-murders
Direct attacks on human life include geoengineering:
Remember the pioneering days of the enhanced mode of depopulation, when new 5G installations caused radiation poisoning whose symptoms were name “covid” by the official narrative? Those days are gone; thechnological progress has exceeded the point, when home routers plugged into the electric grid utilizes electric wiring to act as a 5G network:
Gone are the days of the spectacular phenomena of the 5G towers that are necessary for the global IoT only in areas without electricity, and people are volunteering to participate in their own extermination:
Don’t take me wrong. Cell phone users are still volunteering instant access to their current status and situation, which allows the system to target them in person:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/when-you-are-the-product-but-you
Even lethally:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/kill-switch-in-action
The globalist success is ensured by the introduction of the CBDC:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/cbdcs-in-a-nutshell
It is happening:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-final-stage-to-a-one-world-government
PEACEFUL VIOLENCE STARTS WITH INVASIVE “LAWS” AND END IN MURDER BY “AUTHORITIES.” THE GOVERNMENT NEVER SAVED ANYONE, BUT IT SURELY TREATS PEOPLE AS ITS OWN ASSETS. NOW THAT ALL GOVERNMENTS ARE OWNED BY THE GLOBAL EXTERMINATORS, THE OUTCOME IS EASY TO PREDICT, WHILE EVERY RECENT STEP ON THE PATH DEMONSTRATES THE OBVIOUS.
The crooks have taken the place of “normal,” and people succumbed:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-normalization-of-deviance
This is where I draw the line:
“Peacefully” imposing one’s will on others and destroy their lives by new laws (edicts etc.) is a criminal enterprise. Passing laws is a form of violence. Not all laws are fair, but enforcement and jurisdiction are a million times worse than legislative theory.
Permitless carrying has reduced homicides:
At the same time, gun-free zones kill:
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/data-shows-armed-citizens-stop-mass-killers-most-of-the-time/
Data are grossly misrepresented:
Sure looks to me that government is nothing more than a criminal enterprise and we have seen the results of that over and over.
At last. Making laws is criminal.