67 Comments
Oct 6Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

"While 5G can be turned up to up to 80GHz (not supposed to go over 6GHz for phone services"

Not to dismiss the content. By that statement you mean it's possible with the tech?

These are the allocated frequencies and bandwidths.

https://www.rfpage.com/what-are-5g-frequency-bands/

Expand full comment
author

The radiation frequency and its level are both adjustable, and many towers seem to have their own power supplies, to make sure they operate even during blackouts...

Expand full comment
author

It's what the tech is all about. And not 80, but 100...

Expand full comment

signal scramblers/ jammers / modifiers etc https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=signal+scramblers&atb=v223-1&iax=images&ia=images good GOD please help according to your good will

Expand full comment
Sep 23, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Ray, thank you for the links. I will take a look at them. Meanwhile you can find more info and studies on the harmful effects of 5g and wifi here: https://anom2.tiddlyhost.com/#5G%20main

Expand full comment
author

That's a nice collection. Bookmarked it and will explore.

My general explanation in simple terms is here:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/cell-tower-radiation-revisited-and

And this one is my best on the subject:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-invasion-of-the-infernal-towers

Expand full comment
Aug 6, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

The day they try and force me to get a 5g phone is the day I give up my service. I only use my 4g phone (degoogled) for calls and text. Cell phones are essentially walking prisons.

Expand full comment
author

Cell phone communication is inherently insecure. The provider can always intervene, and everything can be recorded, data can be channeled a redirected, and there is no chip on the Planet that doesn't have a back door...

Expand full comment
Nov 7, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

looking for a degoogled phone. where can i find one?

Ever heard of Murena?

Expand full comment
author

As Stalin said, "It doesn't matter how people vote; what matters is who counts the votes." Translated into phones: "It doesn't matter what kind of phone you have (for privacy and data security); what matters is who controls the service provider (they are all globalist-owned corporations)."

Expand full comment
Mar 4Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Mark37.com

I was one of their first customers. Ghost phone- degoogled. Runs GrapheneOS. Very happy. You just have untether self from all apps that track you and only install open source apps (no Google play store). They are less $ than the competition and very hands on support.

Expand full comment

I don't have a cell phone. I don't find it useful.

Expand full comment

I know nothing about you, other than that you're posting here, but I'm (nearly) certain that you're not using an actual "degoogled" Android phone. You may have uninstalled some apps, but it's hardly that straightforward.

Expand full comment
author
Aug 6, 2023·edited Aug 6, 2023Author

Your phone IS 5G, if it's not old enough to precede the technology. I would say, 2015 or older, with removable batteries and an old SIM card is okay. I've written quite a bit about the topic:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/archive?sort=search&search=cell%20phone

Expand full comment

The first 5G-capable mobile phone SOCs hit the market in 2019.

Expand full comment

I have an iPhone 8 Plus bought in Maui in 2018…is that 5G capable? It says 5G on the top😬

Expand full comment

If it says 5G in top then that means that it is not 5G capable.

Expand full comment

I'm going to have to design some type of diagram so I can follow.

Expand full comment
Apr 19, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Usually I read all your articles.

It looks that somehow I missed this one.

Thanks for the update. 👍🏻

Expand full comment
author
Apr 19, 2023·edited Nov 10, 2023Author

Sometimes I think, I am too prolific, but that is one of the reasons why I charge $15 a month instead of the usual $5-7. I am convinced that my contents are worth more than most, and the only exceptions are the ones who go for details, but even their findings only confirm what I previously conjectured. Since March, 2020, my only mistake was when I believed in the application of mRNA is the vials in August, 2020, but that lasted for less than two months.

I also cover a wider range of topics than most authors on Substack, because I'm sick of regurgitating the same thing over and over. Some of my topics might not be interesting for some readers, and the titles can be misleading, because they are usually clickbaits.

Expand full comment

What does this mean Ray? >

Since March, 2020, my only mistake was when I believed in the application of mRNA is the vials in August, 2020, but that lasted for less than two months. {I'll search your topics?}

Did you mean to say "in the vials" & not "is the vials"? Personally I'm so confused as I've read conflicting articles/stacks about mRNA in vials/not in vials over the past 2 years or so. I'm leaning towards this proposed explanation by the no-virus folks who I greatly respect > Seems as if there is no mRNA in the jabs at all since the "cell theory" is also just another bad biological "theory" in addition to virology being total bunk. And if there are no "cells" to invade than the toxic ingredients in the vials are simply nasty, vile poisons.

Simple as that.

Mike Wallach's "The Viral Delusion" - 5-part documentary - goes into the totally bogus virology field both historically & in depth etc for anyone who hasn't seen it yet. Here:

March 21, 2022 > The Viral Delusion Part 1 Behind The Curtain of The PLANdemic & The Pseudoscience of SARS-COV-2

Watch Part 1 here > https://archive.org/details/the-viral-delusion-part-1-the-tragic-pseudoscience-of-sars

Expand full comment
Apr 19, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

The question is, how to become a paid subscriber or even give a one time gift, when I don't have, never had and do not intend to have a credit card. As far as I can see there's no other payment method.

Expand full comment
author
Apr 19, 2023·edited Apr 19, 2023Author

You don't have to worry about paying me; your participation is worth a lot.

If you have other authors in mind, a store-bought credit card with the amount you would like to spend would work, but it would cost more than what you can spend. Also, I would use up whatever is on it immediately; would not let it sit around with money available on it.

Expand full comment

For sure take finesse and wisdom. Will think about it further. Good points. People need to unify on this.

Expand full comment

Reprioritizing replacing all with wires, my 4g landline, my gas meter. I also know that my computer tower has in inverter that needs shielding or at least distance. Stock up on that heavy duty tinfoil!!

Expand full comment

Me too! I just have to get rid of the WiFi too! Hard as my partner thinks I’m nuts to worry about the EMF, and it’s so convenient

I was reading old posts and comments last week and discovered that you and I have a common background in graphics, pre digital, had to know how to draft and draw :)

T-square, big drawing table, triangle scale ruler etc :). It was my last paycheck job before I went solo earning a living - 1982

Expand full comment

Ah fantastic Susan. I sketch on a grid by hand, but then do clicky clicky now. :\ I miss the pencil sharpening, and the act of a long horizontal line, rolling the pencil to keep it sharp...a bit of art there. The lettering. I miss it, even the smudges. I have heard to spend on a meter that is sensitive on the low freq? end, the small end, which means spending $250 or more...so I am hoping to borrow one? or about as expensive to hire an 'EMF' assessment. I bet there is some electrician who would come by and just do some readings for less, I will look on Craigslist for starters. Gonna cover my bookcase with foil today, and put it between the meter and me. Grew up going to the Henry Ford museum in Detroit about 10 times, school field trips, and there is the spirit of Edison, which is now so creepy to me, these lights, how Tesla was right, (but Musk is not Tesla). Some things that are too big to question that need questioning fe sure. My last paycheck job was working for trade show exhibit fabricators, many here in Poortland Or. on the tails of the athletic gear companies here (nike, adidas, columbia sportswear, janzen...and of course microsoft and cisco...). Now just simple drafting, a bit of 3d but mostly 2d. A dinosaur all over again, I am. best

ps if your spouse sees it on a meter...that may help?

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2023·edited Jan 17, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

I use a Light Phone but don't know too much other than the claims are it does not have 5G capability.

Expand full comment
author

I have no clue what your phone contains, but if I were one of the monsters, I would never sell a phone again without 5G in it; users who don't pay for the feature/service, wouldn't know, but they are the product, anyway.

Expand full comment

No doubt. I am considering taking out the battery and only firing it up when necessary. I am old enough to type confidently I can get along fine without a phone entirely. I also have a camp in the woods where I sleep long and wake rested, so there are spots on the planet the radiation is less. So then it all comes down to a healthy body busily repairing the damage, more or less.

Expand full comment

i cant comment on your other cross post about diabetes but its rubbish and misses huge facts out to make his theory work.

refined carbs skyrocketed in the 70s, they also introduced fluoride into bread instead of bromide which messes up the thyroid. they tinkered with the makeup of salt and took all the helpful parts out.

carbs are long chains of sugar, whilst sugar consumption may have remained similar the amount of refined carbs went up massively. this doesnt even get into the whole problem of the rise in omega 6 to omega 3 ratio through the use of seed oils which are wrecking the body

i could probably go on for weeks with all they have done to eff us up but you get the point

Expand full comment
author

Yes, I agree that this article is misleading, but it does say something about EMF/ELF exposure, which supports my current explanation of the "flu."

It is even worse that the author doesn't allow comments, unless you pay, which I would never do. My "payment" is that all authors can read and comment on my articles for free. Many of them use the info, too, but hardly anyone gives me credit, which is strange to me.

The potential and actual causes of diabetes, as well as potential remedies, would be well worth starting up an article whose discussion section would serve as a magnet for various ideas and open conversations could accomplish even more. I've thought about using the article I "recommended" as an intro, but if you want to contribute a little paragraph to the introduction, it would work even better.

Expand full comment

Thanks Ray. How are able to protect yourself? We are a very mobile society and my family experiences all aforementioned.

Expand full comment
author

Faraday cages are likely ineffective:

The wavelengths are so short that a tiny crevice in the mesh can disable the device and amplify the incoming signal; imagine shaking a box with a pebble in it. Also, the thickness of the shielding makes a difference. Allegedly, you'd need seven layers of aluminum foil for nearby 5G.

Certain harmonizing devices that even out the level of exposure or some crystals might work

Expand full comment
author

It is a bit dangerous to publicize any form of protection, because they will be eliminated in the name of "science." That doesn't mean I subscribe to placebos and I don't buy anything from bottom feeders (like a wire mesh for your bed for $1.2k "on sale"). The jury is still out on most forms of protection, anyway, and I don't think it will ever reach a verdict.

If you agree, this topic could make a good discussion under a title whose sole objective is to collect ideas from people in the comment section and discuss them. Sooner, rather than later, all doors will be closed, anyway.

If you want to initiate the discussion, please, write a brief introduction to the article, which I would use to introduce the subject.

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

You’re doing a great service! Thank you.

A wee bit of information I’ve been wanting to share. I had a wedding ring client last month, he travels a three state area installing the 5G. We’ve been able to have candid conversations in the past so I asked him about his work. His work partner, a young gal, was with him. She is sensitive to the EMF and has frequent tinnitus and headaches while in ‘range’ and during installations. There is a simple way to deactivate them, one-by-one!

One the ground beside each one (in our rural area) one can find a thin fiberglass rod (one meter tall) sticking out of the ground. This marks an underground (usually less than 6”) fiber cable. This cable can be snapped to disable the tower, one doesn’t even need a large tool such as a bolt cutter as the cable contains fiber optic cables, thin glass, and can be tightly folded to snap it.

My client then mentioned that he would never be short on work being as he would be called to come repair.

Expand full comment

What happens when there are state police officers patrolling the tower 24-7? Am I to commit a crime? We should have stopped this in the early 90’s when my brother was laying lines in Djibouti...

Expand full comment
author

Good story! :)

In England, many installers are now receiving worker's comp for radiation sickness.

The French started destroying the towers 6-8 months ago, and used less delicate methods. While I understand the marking rod, I cannot envision the rest.

Soon, the towers will be (and some of them probably already are) protected by security cameras (and people can be recognized even from the way they walk, so the technology is not based on facial recognition).

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

For the obvious reasons of targeting oneself, I have not snuck over and investigated one personally. This fellow, is following up on information I send him on the subject, mostly from you and he is grateful, much more interested now as the couple are expecting a child this summer. They both never succumbed to the injections, I’ve done work for his parents over my long career, first met him when he was in a stroller :)

Expand full comment
author

As long as they haven't had the injections (it's good to hear they haven't) and she notices:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/asthma-and-traditional-vaccines-during

..., they might have a healthy child as long as it's not going to receive any further injections (including the "vitamin K" one after birth, but the only way to make sure is by giving birth at home with a midwife...

They might want to read the classic on "vaccines":

https://fdocc2.wordpress.com/2020/08/24/the-poisoned-needle-by-eleanor-mcbean-1957-is-a-classic-that-you-need-to-know-to-be-medically-informed/

Expand full comment

Found this gem and have been sharing it but not sure if I’ve already shared it on your comments already. A German book from the 1800’s of vaccine deaths and injuries. https://archive.org/details/WegenerHugoImpfFriedhof1912358S.ScanFraktur/page/n189/mode/1up

Expand full comment

Thanks Ray, 'The Poisoned Needle' seems good. I've read a few pages. I'll make time to read the rest.

Expand full comment

Another good analysis (& more recent) here too in case you've missed it.

> Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth – August 3, 2022 - by Anonymous (Author), Zoey O'Toole (Editor), Mary Holland J.D. (Editor, Foreword)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/61605704-turtles-all-the-way-down

The book consolidates a great deal of information (accompanied by detailed analysis) that is scattered in hundreds of medical articles, books, and websites. All discussion is presented in clear and easy-to-understand language, so no medical education is required. It presents several original concepts in addition to laying a robust scientific foundation for the more established ones.

Plus I recommend the classic history of "vaccines" (& the very first serious "vaccine analysis" book I read) by Dr Suzanne Humphries pub in 2013.

> Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines & the Forgotten History (Kindle Edition) - by Suzanne Humphries (Author), Roman Bystrianyk (Author)

https://www.amazon.com/Dissolving-Illusions-Suzanne-Humphries-ebook/dp/B00E7FOA0U/ref=sr_1_1?qid=1687368954&refinements=p_27%3ASuzanne+Humphries&s=digital-text&sr=1-1&text=Suzanne+Humphries

Dissolving Illusions: "Not too long ago, lethal infections were feared in the Western world. Since that time, many countries have undergone a transformation from disease cesspools to much safer, healthier habitats. Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in deaths from all infectious diseases, decreasing to relatively minor levels by the early 1900s."

"The history of that transformation involves famine, poverty, filth, lost cures, eugenicist doctrine, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests over vaccine refusal, and much more."

"Today, we are told that medical interventions increased our lifespan and single-handedly prevented masses of deaths. But is this really true?"

"Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. If the medical profession could systematically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, the question must be asked, “What else is ignored and misinterpreted today?”

"Perhaps the best reason to know our history is so that the worst parts are never repeated."

Expand full comment
author
Jan 17, 2023·edited Jan 18, 2023Author

What it boils down to is that ALL "vaccines" are meant to harm...

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

There's been an explosion of 'auto-immune diseases' since 'vaccines' of all types became 'mandatory'; that is no mere 'coincidence'. The 'vaccines' have robbed us of our God-given natural immunity and replaced it with their SUPPOSED immune-boosting venoms. Yeah; that worked out GREAT. There are more sick people now than before 'MODERN medicine' became mainstream. We should have stayed simple; humble; low-key; natural. Too late to even TRY to put the toothpaste back into the tube.

Expand full comment

They certainly are meant to do that.

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

Appreciate the info and your time in assisting here. I’m leaning so much more too :), I allowed my Cub to be assaulted with the ‘required’ jabs, vitamin K too right off the bat.

I began the child bearing adventure with all the natural methods and birthing info at the time. Three midwives that rotated shifts in the area of upstate NY where I lived.

Ended up with a nightmare of a birth. Water broke on my due date- no hard labor for two days- after which time IV antibiotics were mandated, then the freight train of labor inducing drug. By that time I was hooked up to an assortment of monitoring devices. Labor pain hit and I could see fetal heart rate decrease to alarming degrees. Could NOT focus on relaxing into the ‘process’ as I was terrified the fetus was compromised.

Emergency C section brought her into the world, never so grateful for an operation. She was healthy and alert right off the bat. The Vitamin K was the first assault, which even in my dazed state seemed quite rude.

Her head was very ‘Gumby’ shaped (still off a bit to this day) as she presented with her head bent to one side and would not drop into the birth canal.

Thankfully she’s quite bright- head of class all through her indoctrination-

Regretfully all jabbed now as I was perceived as ‘out there’ and the system is what she trusted- she’s come around but it’s heartbreaking .

Expand full comment
author

Most people can't imagine how common your case was...

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2023Liked by Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)

I have just watched a video on a telegram channel, where an anonymous IT technician claimed that the supposed "5G phones" are a scam because they did not have a 5G-capable chip at all.

He opened two of these phones to show where the chip was supposed to be, and that spot was empty. He said he saw this every day, and that the 5G towers towers must serve other purposes then.

I am in no position to judge the validity of his claims.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for this info! Apparently, one cannot be cautious enough.

That's gaslighting by this "technician." 5G phones report everything they can, including their users' heartbeat. It's the other way around: ALL cell phones MUST have the "5G chip," which is probably of microscopic size and, possibly, are already in the SIM cards, too.

For more, please, read:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/news-about-cell-phones-you-are-unlikely

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-ballad-of-my-cell-phone

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/should-you-remove-the-battery-from

Expand full comment

Do you have fibre to your home Ray, or still the old copper wires?

Expand full comment

Great information!

Expand full comment
author

Again, something that cannot be found elsewhere. :)

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

Yes, graphene oxide was found in dental Lidocaine (so, it's probably in all Lidocaine products) in November, 2021.

Expand full comment

Ray - The 2021 article you mention leaves a little doubt about whether graphene is used > Suspected presence of Graphene Oxide in injectable Lidocaine

https://www.orwell.city/2021/10/lidocaine.html

Oct 26, 2021 - In a new program, La Quinta Columna has shared new optical microscopy images of injectables that they suspect may contain graphene oxide. On this occasion, they have observed drops of injectable lidocaine, an anesthetic widely used in dentistry.

But this (& other) article leaves no doubt about graphene being found in dental products.

> Graphene-Based Nanomaterials for Dental Applications: Principles, Current Advances, and Future Outlook

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.804201/full

Summary: "With the development of nanotechnology, nanomaterials have been used in dental fields over the past years. Among them, graphene and its derivatives have attracted great attentions, owing to their excellent physicochemical property, morphology, biocompatibility, multi-differentiation activity, and antimicrobial activity. In our review, we summarized the recent progress about their applications on the dentistry. The synthesis methods, structures, and properties of graphene-based materials are discussed. Then, the dental applications of graphene-based materials are emphatically collected and described. Finally, the challenges and outlooks of graphene-based nanomaterials on the dental applications are discussed in this paper, aiming at inspiring more excellent studies."

REVIEW article - Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10 March 2022

Sec. Biomaterials Volume 10 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.804201

My thanks to you Ray for having written on this & my following comment to all this:

The blithe (lacking due thought or consideration : casual, heedless) & cheerful article explanations in the 2022 paper (linked directly above) lauding the use of graphene in dentistry are not only quite sickening but indicative of the blind obedience to so-called unthinking "science" over normal good health. Anyone with a brain in their head (or common sense/good instincts/wariness of unproven drugs) would be scared & appalled.

(and there are many more articles for folks under that subject heading using duckduckgo)

Expand full comment