A Midwestern Doctor...

Okay, I Have Two Doctoral Degrees. Someone Here Is Making a Killing Here Just by Calling Herself a "Doctor," although All She Has Is a Ph.D in English.

Differences in opinions can be clear, but spectacular.

---

A Midwestern Doctor published the following today:

What Made Doctors Do the Right Thing During COVID-19?

My thoughts are following the points made in his article.

The problem of consistency in thinking

While he and I hardly ever agree, we both have respect for each other’s honest and open approaches. Sometime last year, we agreed that it would be rare for two well-meaning and intelligent people to agree on everything. In this case, we are quite a bit on the same tracks, albeit with a few spectacular differences.

He is asking the question: “What makes a few people resilient to misinformation and keep them independent thinkers?” He seems to suggest that there is a pivot on which thinking is based, and he calls it a “fulcrum.” I am determined to make it sound a lot more simple and easier to comprehend, because his narrative reads like he is still figuring it out and still hasn’t finalized the direction, the terminology, and the expectations from potential solutions.

The very term “fulcrum” suggests systemic thinking. All systems require fundamental premises that must be accepted before even starting to use them for thinking. In open systems (those amount to just about everything around), the premises can shift or change without collapsing the system, while in closed systems (e.g. fixing a car or doing algebra), if the fundamental premise(s) change(s), the whole system falls apart.

The trouble is that the human mind is usually capable of thinking in two-dimensional static models that are barely adequate even for occasional problem-solving. Consequently, whatever humans think or say about nearly anything is based on insufficient information about open systems that have the unkindly proneness to change from time to time. Demanding “evidence” under the circumstances is like asking you to shoot a fly with a six-shooter in a dark movie theater.

What does all this mean, when it comes to thinking straight and/or, Heaven forbid, trying to be an honest “healer”?

The myths of personal superiority and full comprehension

No need to over-complicate things. The doctor’s article suggests that it is, however rare, to be “awake.” He is going on a long road-trip regarding the subject, but I am finding the answer quite prosaic. In my understanding, once people have to take responsibility for their decisions, all of a sudden, they are “awake.” That applies even to children after they form their sense of identity around the age of five, but they need to be respected and given the chance to make their own decisions. In a culture, where even teenagers are often referred to as “kids,” that would be an over-achievement, wouldn’t you say?

People love to join the blaming game during which they follow someone’s advice and if the advice works, it’s fine, and if it doesn’t, there is someone else to blame. Sadly, with the lethal injections and the next steps in the globalist timetable towards Agenda 2030, they won’t have much time to blame anyone else but their own gullibility.

And there are others, who believe academic baloney like “mass formation” for something that can be explained with a lot less pretentiousness:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-mass-formation-of-morons-using

Such externalizing prevails, because it appeals to people’s self-respect by telling them they are better than others, and because the simple idea (and there is nothing new about it) dressed up in some academic terminology is easy to conceive. Eventually, the rhetoric of power takes over, when demagogues and manipulators use the word “we,” preferably combined with some labeling of dissenters (“anti-vaxxer” was prolifically effective, but so was the opposite, which managed to divide people, and divided people are easy to confuse and rule over). Sadly, the good doctor is using “we,” although “we” doesn’t exist:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-is-we-learn-from-the-best

Creating heroes

“Heroes” are essential for the guideless, because they need someone to follow.

I don’t have an opinion on Tucker, because I don’t watch TV and hardly ever watch videos. That enables me to take my time for reading information and making up my own mind. Not watching TV, however, might be a good first step towards independent thinking, although in my academic career, my best guess is that only about 30% can do it. Still, they are the only ones who can make a difference and if you are reading this, there is a good chance you are one of them. You can safely assume that ANYTHING on TV is part of the universal deception, because since 2012, about 94% of the MSM has been owned by the same international corporations that are, incidentally, also owned by their global conglomerates.

In the following five-minute video, Dr. Miller himself substantiates that “viral infection” doesn’t exist by saying that he was covered with “HIV blood” (AIDS is an invented illness and the test for it is just as much of a fraud as the PCR/antigen tests were for “covid”):

https://rumble.com/v2iu8gh-dr-miller-on-fox-news.html

He demonstrated a high level of personal integrity, but he was still pushing the “madical” (my intentional misspelling) paradigm (Germ Theory) that made the whole mass murder and hysteria possible.

Heroes are often created out of people who openly “oppose” the system, while they are only confirming its fraudulent paradigms:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-do-lies-become-the-truth

RFK, Jr.:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/changing-the-system-from-the-inside

or DeSantis are good candidates:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/again-something-i-said-several-months

Dr. Noack or Dr. Buttar were not so lucky, because they both pointed out that mass murder was in progress:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-about-dr-rashid-buttar

Why does it matter if someone can think for themselves?

Those who are unable or unwilling to think for themselves, are waiting for Santa, but the chimney has been walled up for a long time:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/where-is-santa-when-he-is-most-needed

As the good doctor also notes, personal integrity has two essential elements: personal responsibility and something greater to live for than mere survival. Those who don’t have these, live in fear, and they will always find something to be afraid of, be it WW3, another plandemic, an alien attack, or even Rudolph, the reindeer.

Recognizing false narratives and mass manipulation is remarkably easy:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-can-be-done

Several critical tools are available for those who dare and are able to think, but I don’t think most people are even interested in the truth, because that would require their taking responsibility:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-people-really-want-to-know-the

How far is possible to be a healer at all?

It is a terribly difficult task to be a healer. Firstly, there is no working paradigm, so the whole activity rests on a trial-and-error basis. Well, some progress over the presiding paradigm is easy to make:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-makes-people-sick-apart-from

Also, the rate of the general poisoning is by now probably more than anyone could do anything about:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/bioweapons

I often have the impression that healing itself, as it is (mis)understood these days, is only a myth:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/is-healing-a-myth-altogether

Controlling emotions?

About 50 years ago, there were already about 300 trends in the pseudo-science, Psychology. Their representatives managed to agree only on two things:

1. they were able to help patient by hearing them out;

2. people who lose their sense of continuity of the self, go insane. (This is also remarkable, because “midlife crisis” became a fashionable term at the same time.)

“Repressing emotions” goes back to Freud (or should it be spelled “Fraud”?). It is the integrity of the personality that counts, but without a guiding principle, it inevitably falls apart. Only those who can find something greater to live for than mere survival and, by this, exceed the perspective of a rat or a cockroach, can hope for a direction that maintains the continuity of the self. Once it’s done, no “emotional” expert is needed for someone to face themselves.

Conclusions

As for the good doctor’s “conclusions,” he seems to have arrived at whatever I’ve also written a lot of times before, and I don’t know which of us came first, because I never copy people and don’t follow up on anyone borrowing my ideas or, for that matter, anyone who arrives at the same conclusions.

Still, I believe, I’ve managed to add to his article and make is more accessible for those who don’t necessarily pay homage to the “madical” or the “academic” myths. Of course, you’ll be the judge of that, en route to your self-sufficient island.