Ivermectin As a Bait-and-Switch Operation

Two fellow authors finally expand on my old posts

And they receive confirmation from their peers, so they must be right! There is nothing like the warmth of the pigsty!

---

Bait-and-switch operations happen all the time, but they deserve more attention than the amount they have been receiving. The story of Ivermectin (IVM) seems to fit into the collection of such psyops. Whatever comes out now as “the truth,” usually comes out so late that nothing can be done about it, or there are far more advanced methods for accomplishing the same objectives, as in the case of the convid injections or nanoparticle poisoning.

My observations about Ivermectin have been around for quite a while, but it’s good to see two good authors expanding on them in ways that allow me to learn new details, too, although I’ve never missed the target as a whole. Let me reiterate what I have already said and share what I have learned.

I’m asking you not to make your conclusions until you have considered my thoughts at the end of this article. What I can promise is a balanced assessment, as usual, because I avoid bombastic statements and journalistic simplicity.

“Agent” on the topic

“Agent” just came out with a comprehensive analysis of the history and pharmaceutical application of Ivermectin (IVM. As (s)he doesn’t allow comments, only if I pay (in spite of him/her promising me a “free subscription,” which was generously forgotten), and everything is free on my site, I must elaborate only here:

Ivermectin & Population Control Poison: a Deep Dive into a Nobel Prize Winning Medicine

I’ll reflect on the text first.

“Agent” does an excellent job at describing the history of the drug based on an illness, “river blindness,” whose origin has never been properly identified, which is the rule, not the exception in modern Madicine which invents illnesses to cover up for common poisonings and “diagnoses” from symptoms that can mean a million things, which even many MDs choose to or forced to ignore or even notice. During my reading, when I got to “Just in 2006, Merck donated over 69 million doses” of IVM to people living in areas inhabited by black flies, I immediately remembered AZT, a “cure” for an invented illness, AIDS, while it was the cure itself caused the condition in the West. I started wondering if IVM would do the same, but I was sure it would do something bad, because nothing is free in life, especially not from such a pharmaceutical company as the IVM manufacturer, Merck. It didn’t surprise me that the bacteria for the pills are lab-grown, just like the yeast for making most cheeses in the US.

However, the chemicals used during manufacturing IVM are gene-altering, which creates the ideal victim out of those who take the pills. “These lab-made GMO Avermectins, created from mutant bacteria (Streptomyces avrrmitillis) are so toxic that they kill Arthropods” is a description of the drug that must be taken seriously, but it doesn’t stop there: “Arthropods have a major role in maintaining ecosystems as pollinators, recyclers of nutrients, scavengers and food for other animals.” That means a direct attack on the food supply, which didn’t start yesterday. The democidal plan becomes a bit more obvious, when you learn that “only 0.05% of it is needed to kill life,” although it’s a bit unclear it’s 0.05% of what. “Agent” closes the circle by properly noting,

Vitamin D IS Rat Poison, but they tell me it doesn’t hurt people. Vitamin B3 IS insecticide that contaminated a city, but that doesn’t hurt people either. K2 IS pesticide and rat poison, but it doesn’t hurt people. Vitamin B is made from cyanide, but it’s a special type of cyanide that doesn’t hurt people (also developed by Merck). Ivermectin IS insecticide, but it doesn’t hurt people. Why are all these vitamins and miracle cures literal poison that kills life?”

After that, “Agent” goes a bit overboard by saying,

And I know someone is going to say, “Everything is poison! It’s the dose that makes it safe!” - NO, everything is not poison. Nobody got diabetes from eating too many apples. Nobody had a heart attack from too much broccoli. Hell, nobody has ever become obese from pounding bags of carrots all day. Not everything is poison. And nobody ever died from drinking too much clean water either. I might write a post just on that because it is the most common rebuttal and it’s simply false.

Being a bit off the board is his/her privilege besides doing such a good job, but let me briefly address the inaccuracies, and I don’t believe (s)he is going to “write a rebuttal” of these. Both apples and broccoli are copiously sprayed, and even organics receive their unhealthy doses from chemtrails and hydroponics get enough from the water given to them, and the only remedy is to eat in moderation and allow the body to detoxify itself, although that has become more and more impossible in some environments. In fact, I remember someone dying in England around 1980 after eating too many carrots all the time (due to pesticides, I guess, but “organic” carrots happen to be quite contaminated as well), but “Agent” is right to a certain extent: the guy didn’t die of obesity. On the other hand, I’m pretty sure that even drinking too much water can kill anyone over time by overexerting the heart and the kidneys.

However, that’s only nit-picking; my serious concerns come up at the end of this post. “Agent” was the first who ingeniously popularized safety data sheets which, for IVM, show that it is a nerve toxin, when taken internally. Still, it gets worse:

It turns out that the toxins included can cause the same symptoms as the “illnesses” they are supposed to prevent. My AZT analogy before reading the article in full wasn’t all that mistaken, after all. As a bonus, IVM can be deadly, when inhaled in a powder form or ingested as a madication, and for surviving subjects, it can cause reproductive harm, that is, it prevents pregnancies. “Agent” kindly and fairly gives credit to Tim for discovering the latter, although it seems that the whole idea belongs to Tim (whom I will check out later, but not in this article), which “Agent” appropriately complemented according to his/her best and exceptional abilities:

Ultimate Guide To Anti-Fertility Ivermectin Genocide: 14 Studies Showing It Wrecks Fertility

“Agent” also includes a link to another post by Tim that elaborated on the deadly toll of IVM. Another important link includes one to dpl, who has given both “Agent” and me good ideas before, too:

Fighting Lockdowns & Poison Ops: Experimentation Dismantles Foundations of Public Health Tyranny

To my surprise, “Agent” completes the circle with a reference AZT, which I wrote about already in 2022, when I assumed that AZT may also be in the convid injections, and considering how many unknown ingredients they contained, this is only one more option.

What I have noticed is that IVM has even been peddled as a miracle drug that cures cancer, and cancer patients tend to be the most vulnerable to madical intimidation, so they have been directly targeted.

IVM was first demonized by “authorities,” and becoming permitted later immediately raised a red flag for me. Becoming permitted and promoted spoke for itself, because the “authorities” who had been so subservient to the globalist project simply couldn’t have become all benevolent, unless it was a limited hangout or the second part of a psyop. Nonetheless when I wrote about it, which made next to no impact, except for causing me to lose a few dozen subscribers and a friend:

Shills like Vigilant Fox have been marketing and even selling IVM online, especially after acquiring enough funds (from taxpayer from the black budget?) to start an independent site.

Conclusion

As a Zinc ionophore, it does act as an antioxidant, and as such, it could possible be helpful under certain circumstances, but as you must know by now, ANYTHING synthetic is more likely carries greater risk than any benefits. At the same time, humans are exposed to so many synthetic concoctions that one chemical might affect a previous one favorably. That, however, lays down the foundation for a full-range gaslighting on the subject. That’s when thinking in a single open system can come to one’s aid, which is what I always do in my conjecturing, whenever I encounter insufficient or contradictory data.

Is it possible that parasites can also cause imbalance in the body to the point that the body cannot restore its original equilibrium? In that case, a restart might be required, whether it’s possible or not, but there is evidence that it is. In order to achieve that result, the dosage of IVM used must kill only creatures whose tolerance to the poison is lower than the threshold for human beings, so it can act as an anti-parasitic in humans. Where is that limit? I don’t think anyone knows. Moreover, the balance also includes bacteria, and while IVM might wipe the slate clean for parasites with which humans are living in symbiosis, antibiotics are also needed for wiping out most of the gut flora, which might give a chance for the body to reconstruct its bacterial balance (which presides over what has been mistakenly called “the immune system”).

As I often mention, cumulative effects are never investigated, and there are too many around that can produce identical symptoms.

While my reasoning is logical, only the AI that mixes the ingredients in drugs sold to the public knows what’s in a pill or a vial, so no matter how hard one tries, the result is hit-and-miss. I guess, it’s mostly miss.