Everything Is Related in Ways Nobody Knows

But who cares?

Yet there is a telegram that affects the sender, too. Nobody is only an NPC:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/you-are-not-an-npc

---

When his mother died, my father came home around 6 PM and said, “My mother died.” Surely enough, a couple of hours later, the telegram arrived. Now how could he have possibly known from 200 miles away?

When I was 17, 18, or even 21, I was able to sense people’s past AND future, if I focused on them, but I chose to go without that ability, because I wasn’t sure that it was good for anyone, and also, because it was literally killing me. The world next to this was not unknown to me; around 14, I had experienced a parallel world full of spirits, angels, or demons (whatever you call them), and I immediately realized that even the least powerful among them was infinitely more powerful than I could ever be. I needed protection from them by good forces (a guardian angel or something like that), and made sure I would never cross the line again. Those powers can turn anyone crazy in no time, and I had no way to control them. I had learnt that I would never cross the boundary to that other place again, because I knew where the boundary was.

Why am I telling you this? I am not all nuts, not even a religious one, but I have seen what I’ve seen:

This world is more than the eyes can catch, but I don’t buy into any esoteric crap. In the last 60 years or more, I’ve had my moments of contact with the Creating Power, and everything that I was told would be happening to me (with certain stipulations that I honored) is still going on.

So, are people just pack animals, are they exclusively prone to succumb to herd immunity to common sense, or are they even defenseless against conformity or, as some would say, using the misleading term, of “mass formation”?

At one point, I wrote that The Whole World Is Music, but it’s so much more. It’ been known for quite a while that even plants “like” symmetrically-structured classical music, and they go “insane,” when exposed to cacophony or, worse, music pretending to be music, but offering only beats and no harmony.

When my children were born, they turned out to be pretty much the way I was when they were conceived. If that applies to everyone, it places enormous responsibility on the shoulders of prospective parents.

The following article explores the possibility of DNA manipulation in immaterial ways:

The Backster Effect

The findings suggest that life DOES start at conception or, well, even before that.

Also, in my experience, it goes a LOT further.

The phenomenon also reminds me of the Pygmalion-effect: in one-sided communication (which is based on my findings; internet resources on the Pygmalion-effect, in my opinion, are spreading nonsense most of the time), the person with the upper hand HAS the ability to fantastically improve the performance of their subjects as long as the projection (s)he uses contains remarkable expectations... Subordinates usually cannot fight back. I have always treated everyone (even “bosses”) as my equal (a huge mistake most of the time, but I took my chances; people are NOT equal is many senses of the world, and they tended to perceive my benevolence as a weakness), and as I was growing older, I managed to discover something good in mostly everyone (about 99 our of 100, and I’m not saying the “1” was their mistake), and I only encouraged THAT. It worked, too.

It’s quite certain that racial DNA makes races unique (which is why I am against race mixing), and it’s been substantiated over time that “genetic memory” exists for dangers and rewards as well as for vegetative reactions (okay, for using and consuming stuff). What the DNA experiments the article describes haven’t been able to measure much is that the outcome goes both ways: by definition according to the experiments, the subjects also affect the “scientist.”

Now, it has become common knowledge that 5G and comparable technology can be used for “downloading” personal DNA:

Betty’s article uses the behaviorist approach of stimuli-response, which sadly, happens to apply to most people, because people usually rely on their conditioning and their automated responses that worked in their lives, and don’t even know how and when they can take advantage of their Free Will. 5G phones, not that they are alone with this, can locate, track, listen in, and transmit frequencies emitted by their users, which makes it easier to influence people’s feelings and behavior by invoking conformist reactions or covering an area with specific frequencies that have been proven to impose specific reactions since the first such experiments in the early 1960s. Some people can be hypnotized and the vast majority conforms to the behavior of the crowd, as the muzzle mandates copiously demonstrated. And no, while I cannot be hypnotized at all, I am not immune to those frequencies, either. Also, those who can beat the polygraph (it’s actually a walk in the park, if you know how to control vegetative reactions, and yoga helped me; I probably wouldn’t be alive, if it hadn’t, although I practiced it only for about a year at the age of 17). As a result, conditioning through emotions would not work on me, but they are still not easy for me to resist. The only way I can do it is that I know what’s happening, where it’s coming from, what the objective of the manipulation is and, most importantly, what I actually want under the circumstances.

Betty’s article mentions the “weaponization of emotional manipulation,” whatever that means. Ever since I started out with the idea of the weaponization of hope in October, 2022, and exercise a bit later, the term has been caught up and has been spreading like a wildfire. May I add, at this point, the weaponization of light as well? Not that I haven’t written about it, but these days, when the Sun burns due to chemtrail activities, several sources encourage their audiences to use the sunlight to be healed or whatever, which used to work, but these days, such attempts must be considered with caution.

Betty takes the deployment of mRNA technology for granted, but it’s most likely not used, unless in extremely controlled environments. There are plenty of other ways to achieve the same outcome.

As for the “ethical imperative” mentioned by Betty, already Immanuel Kant substantiated that good and evil, right and wrong, and whatever similar things one can come up with, cannot exist, unless there is a benign Creator, so talking about ethics to the madmen run amuck cannot lead anywhere. Okay, when I was 17, I developed the hypothesis that the most selfish are the most unselfish, because they know what’s good for them. That hypothesis has not been refuted, but the globalists have detached part of the world for themselves, so for them it only applies among themselves, because the rest of humanity they consider insects doesn’t matter to them.

As for being “cautiously” optimistic, my previous maxim stands: Whatever can be done, has been done, is being done, or will be done soon. The ONLY chance people have is to rise to a level of consciousness where they can actually exercise their free will. That’s most likely out of the question for the vast majority, which again seems to be proving that eugenics is not totally wrong, although the mass murderers using technology are demonstrating exactly what they are. They are holding all the cards, control all the finances, guarding all exist, and even if honest research was possible without million-dollar equipment, the results would never make it to the public.

It’s ridiculously easy to disorient people. The widely-mandated greeting, “Be safe,” for one, implies that you are not safe. That places everything into a perspective in which safety is a priority, while anyone with two brain cells to rub together must know that nobody can be safe all the time. In movies since the early 1970s, there is a similar sentence that is in every single one of them, “Are you all right?” Without that sentence no movie was allowed to be distributed in North America, and I have no idea where else, but it’s there even in foreign movies in the subtitles. “Gaslighting” is pretty similar, but it can contain a poetic variety of alternatives as well as the ultimate method.

So, once about 70 percent of humans are either unable to think for themselves or are unwilling to make their own decisions, where does that leave you?

Care to fight against slavery? Revisit and revise your primary, secondary, and ongoing conditioning: